elliston@av8tr.UUCP (Keith Elliston) (10/26/90)
Hi Does anyone out there know if there is a way to force FastA to sort the list of output scores by the Opt score? I have a user that seems to think that this score is more important that the init1 and initn scores. We are running the GCG implementation of FastA, but if it works for the generic version, I can figure out a way to make it work for the GCG version. Thanks Keith uunet!av8tr!elliston -- =============================================================================== Keith O. Elliston | .signature really under construction.... uunet!av8tr!elliston | ===============================================================================
wrp@biochsn.acc.Virginia.EDU (William R. Pearson) (11/07/90)
In article <573@av8tr.UUCP> elliston@av8tr.UUCP (Keith Elliston) writes: > >Does anyone out there know if there is a way to force FastA to sort the list >of output scores by the Opt score? I have a user that seems to think that >this score is more important that the init1 and initn scores. The latest release of fasta (version 1.5) does this. It is much slower, however, because it calculates an optimized score for every sequence in the library with an initn score over the cut off. However, this makes it somewhat more sensitive. You can pick it up via anonymous ftp from uvaarpa.virginia.EDU. Bill Pearson