[sci.chem] Blood and detecting "Pool P"

roy@phri.nyu.edu (Roy Smith) (11/25/90)

larry@kitty.UUCP (Larry Lippman) writes:
> I feel confident that 300-year old blood can be reliably identified *as
> blood*, I am highly doubtful that any species identification can be made.

	Would it be possible to recover enough DNA to do PCR on it?  I seem
to remember reading something about doing PCR on DNA from a frozen quagga
(a zebra-like beast which became extinct in the last ice age, now only
found on "rogue" games).  The quagga DNA was O(10,000) years old, which is
considerably older than 300 years, but perhaps freezing is a better method
of preserving than drying on paper?

	Assuming you could do PCR, how hard would it be to determine the
species?  The most likely other candidates would probably be some sort of
food animal, such as cow, pig, or chicken (or whatever animals they were
eating 300 years ago; the point is, other primates would be unlikely).
Actually, it just occurred to me that red blood cells don't have DNA, if I
remember correctly, but maybe some other component of blood does?

	Now, about "Pool P", everybody knows that the way to detect it is
to look for the warm spots. :-)
--
Roy Smith, Public Health Research Institute
455 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016
roy@alanine.phri.nyu.edu -OR- {att,cmcl2,rutgers,hombre}!phri!roy
"Arcane?  Did you say arcane?  It wouldn't be Unix if it wasn't arcane!"

forbes@aries.scs.uiuc.edu (Jeff Forbes) (11/26/90)

In article <1990Nov25.154239.17434@phri.nyu.edu> roy@phri.nyu.edu (Roy Smith) writes:

>Actually, it just occurred to me that red blood cells don't have DNA, if I
>remember correctly, but maybe some other component of blood does?

You are correct. Mammalian erythrocytes do not have a nucleus and therefore
no DNA. Other cellular components of blood do have a nucleus, but the 
concentration is much less than the erythrocytes. Avian erythrocytes do
have a nucleus.



Jeff Forbes

"....I have not failed. I've just found 10,000 ways that won't work."
			Thomas Edison

andrewt@cs.su.oz (Andrew Taylor) (11/26/90)

In article <1990Nov25.154239.17434@phri.nyu.edu> roy@phri.nyu.edu (Roy Smith)
writes:
> 	Would it be possible to recover enough DNA to do PCR on it?  I seem
> to remember reading something about doing PCR on DNA from a frozen quagga
> (a zebra-like beast which became extinct in the last ice age, now only
> found on "rogue" games).

Quaggas became extinct about 100 years ago (in Southern Africa). Maybe
you have the wrong animal?

larry@kitty.UUCP (Larry Lippman) (11/26/90)

In article <1990Nov25.154239.17434@phri.nyu.edu>, roy@phri.nyu.edu (Roy Smith) writes:
> larry@kitty.UUCP (Larry Lippman) writes:
> > I feel confident that 300-year old blood can be reliably identified *as
> > blood*, I am highly doubtful that any species identification can be made.
> 
> 	Would it be possible to recover enough DNA to do PCR on it?

	I don't believe that any DNA fragments would exist in the dry
condition of a 300-year old blood stain, notwithstanding the fact that
mature mammalian erythrocytes don't have a nucleus, mitochondria,
ribosomes, etc.  Leucocytes are a true cell with a nucleus and DNA,
but I rather doubt that any would be found in a 300-year old blood
stain.

	I can't offer any authoritative comments on DNA issues, though.
I don't do DNA, genetic mapping or any aspect of molecular biology.
I have enough trouble maintaining competency in selected more traditional
aspects of chemistry and biochemistry! :-)

> Actually, it just occurred to me that red blood cells don't have DNA, if I
> remember correctly, but maybe some other component of blood does?

	As far as I can recall, no *mature* mammalian erythrocytes possess
DNA.  Erythrocytes of birds, reptiles, etc. do have a nucleus with DNA and
all the trimmings, though.

> 	Now, about "Pool P", everybody knows that the way to detect it is
> to look for the warm spots. :-)

	That's the solution!  An IR thermographic imaging system coupled
with a VCR to catch the perpetrator in the act!  Showing instant replays
would probably be more embarrassing than any chemical indicator... :-)

Larry Lippman @ Recognition Research Corp.  "Have you hugged your cat today?"
VOICE: 716/688-1231   {boulder, rutgers, watmath}!ub!kitty!larry
FAX:   716/741-9635                  {utzoo, uunet}!/      \aerion!larry

eesnyder@boulder.Colorado.EDU (Eric E. Snyder) (11/27/90)

In article <4200@kitty.UUCP> larry@kitty.UUCP (Larry Lippman) writes:
>In article <1990Nov25.154239.17434@phri.nyu.edu>, roy@phri.nyu.edu (Roy Smith) writes:
>> 	Would it be possible to recover enough DNA to do PCR on it?
>
>	I don't believe that any DNA fragments would exist in the dry
>condition of a 300-year old blood stain.....

I bet there would be PCRable DNA fragments....  Remember that DNA is 
a remarkably stable molecule (even in my hands).  Furthermore, PCR only
requires a few molecules of template to give a signal... that is not too
much to ask.  One could easily do species ID by selecting a highly 
polymorphic locus such as beta-casein and sequencing the amplified 
product.  
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
TTGATTGCTAAACACTGGGCGGCGAATCAGGGTTGGGATCTGAACAAAGACGGTCAGATTCAGTTCGTACTGCTG
Eric E. Snyder                            
Department of MCD Biology            We are not suspicious enough 
University of Colorado, Boulder      of words, and calamity strikes.
Boulder, Colorado 80309-0347
LeuIleAlaLysHisTrpAlaAlaAsnGlnGlyTrpAspLeuAsnLysAspGlyGlnIleGlnPheValLeuLeu
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

ireland@ac.dal.ca (11/28/90)

In article <1516@cluster.cs.su.oz.au>, andrewt@cs.su.oz (Andrew Taylor) writes:
> In article <1990Nov25.154239.17434@phri.nyu.edu> roy@phri.nyu.edu (Roy Smith)
> writes:
>> 	Would it be possible to recover enough DNA to do PCR on it?  I seem
>> to remember reading something about doing PCR on DNA from a frozen quagga
>> (a zebra-like beast which became extinct in the last ice age, now only
>> found on "rogue" games).
> 
> Quaggas became extinct about 100 years ago (in Southern Africa). Maybe
> you have the wrong animal?

If I remember correctly, two different experiments are being confused here.
The quagga DNA came from a museum specimen, possibly a hide. The PCR done
on DNA isolated from a beast which was frozen and extinct from the last
ice age came from a wooly mammoth. 

Keith Conover      ireland@ac.dal.ca