[net.auto] Mitsubishis, sun roofs, and rear lou

hakanson@orstcs.UUCP (12/10/83)

#R:ihuxw:-61200:orstcs:3000023:000:4587
orstcs!hakanson    Dec  9 10:44:00 1983

OK, you asked for it (not a Toyota, silly):

	1)  I don't own a Cordia (Turbo, or otherwise).  However, I do
	    own a Mitsubishi, of sorts, in the form of a 1980 Dodge
	    Colt Hatchback (FWD).  On Mitsubishi's in general, I think
	    that they are very reliable, well-engineered, and well-
	    thought-out cars.  My Colt has never (Knock Wood) failed
	    to start, run, or get me where I was going.  (We did
	    once lose the water pump belt, but it hadn't quite made
	    it to the 30K mile replacement interval.  This showed me
	    that overheating didn't damage anything.)

	    One thing I have noticed on the negative side is perhaps
	    a problem with all cars, foreign or domestic.  It's very
	    hard to find someone who knows what they are doing when
	    it comes to working on the things.  On my Mits. product,
	    one recommended maintenance service is quite expensive
	    (repacking the front wheel bearings every 22.5K miles runs
	    about $75-100, since you have to pull the entire hub
	    assembly from the drive-shafts).  I have been told by a
	    Dodge mechanic who I trust (v. hard to find!) and by another
	    trustworthy mechanic that it is reasonable to wait on this
	    service until it is time to replace the disc brake pads,
	    or about 40K miles -- that way the expense is shared between
	    the two operations.  The bottom line on Mitsubishi's as well
	    as other cars is:  Do as much of the work yourself as you
	    can, referring to a service manual to find out how hard things
	    are to do.

	    From prowling around under the hood of my Colt, I have noticed
	    that Mitsubishi has done a nice clean job of integrating all the
	    emission controls so they are not all "hung on" the outside of
	    the motor.  The troubleshooting procedures are not all that
	    complicated, and it's easy enough for me to tell if all the
	    systems are working properly.  I imagine a turbo will complicate
	    things greatly, as will EFI, Electronic Ignition, etc.  The
	    price we pay for performance....  My MCA-Jet engine works very
	    well, giving impressive low-end torque (from ~1500 rpm) and
	    turning freely up to 6000 rpm, though there is hardly any need
	    to go that high.  My Colt has the 1.6l engine and their
	    Twin-Stick transmission (4x2 gears), which is a fun combination.
	    I usually drive it like a 5-speed (1st thru 4th in low range,
	    then shift to high), but in the high altitudes or when playing
	    around, those half-ranges come in handy.  I average ~36mpg
	    monthly, about 50-50 town and freeway driving, in case you
	    are interested.  (BTW, did you know that the 5-speed in the
	    Mitsubishi's is the same as a Twin-Stick transmission, only
	    when you shift into 5th gear, the transmission is electrically
	    shifted from low to high range, just the way I use mine?!)

	
	2)  On louvers -- I don't have them, and I wouldn't have them, for
	    the simple reasons that they obstruct rear vision (minor
	    complaint) and they greatly clutter up the outside of a car,
	    both visually and aerodynamically.


	3)  On sunroofs -- I also don't have one, and specifically told
	    the dealer I would not take a car including one, for the
	    following reasons:

	    a)  My car has marginal headroom, and the sunroofs I saw
		took about a half-inch away, since the seam was near
		the outer side of your head if you were sitting in
		the front seat.  If you are shorter than me, then
		this is no problem.
	    
	    b)  A sunroof of most any variety cuts a large hole in the
		metal roof of a unibody car.  It therefore removes some
		of the structural rigidity of the car's body.  This can
		make for mushy handling in the extremes, or could merely
		result in increased rattles & squeaks.  Ever wonder why
		convertibles and Targas and T-tops usually have stiffened
		bodies?  Of course, a sunroof isn't quite the same thing,
		but how stiff can a glass panel be when it is opened up?

	    c)  Again, only a carefully installed sunroof will not add
		any visual or aerodynamic clutter to the outside (or
		inside) of a car.  Of course, a Colt or Cordia isn't
		all that aerodynamic in the first place, but why make
		it worse?
	    
	    d)  Besides, in Oregon, who needs a rain-roof?


Well, I'm sure you've all heard more than you need to know about Dodge
Colts, etc.  I'll jump on the bandwagon and say:

	The above opinions are my own and are not anyone else's.
			   So there!

Marion Hakanson			CSnet:  hakanson@oregon-state
				UUCP :  {hp-pcd,teklabs}!orstcs!hakanson