jtc@tessera.UUCP (J.T. Conklin) (11/16/89)
In article <36406@ism780c.isc.com> support@ism780c.UUCP (Support account) writes: >.... >386/ix Support Is it too much to ask for ISC employees in support to include their names in their signatures? It's a little disconscerting to read messages from the anonymous "Support account". --jtc -- J.T. Conklin ...!{ubc-cs,uunet}!van-bc!tessera!jtc
karl@ddsw1.MCS.COM (Karl Denninger) (11/22/89)
In article <[256a326c:477.2]comp.unix.i386;1@vpnet.UUCP> lisbon@vpnet.UUCP (Gerry Swetsky) writes: > >jtc@tessera.UUCP [J.T. Conklin] writes: > >> In article <36406@ism780c.isc.com> support@ism780c.UUCP (Support account) >> writes: >>>.... >>>386/ix Support >> >> Is it too much to ask for ISC employees in support to include their names >> in their signatures? It's a little disconscerting to read messages from >> the anonymous "Support account". > > Forgive the sarcasm, J. T., but some folks are never satisfied. I > don't care if he/she signs his/her name Rin-Tin-Tin. > > Question: Does SCO provide net support in the xenix group? Yes, in cases where it's needed. Which isn't often, IMHO :-) -- Karl Denninger (karl@ddsw1.MCS.COM, <well-connected>!ddsw1!karl) Public Access Data Line: [+1 708 566-8911], Voice: [+1 708 566-8910] Macro Computer Solutions, Inc. "Quality Solutions at a Fair Price"