[comp.unix.i386] Vectra SCSI + BellTech vs SCO questionseseses

kmont@hpindda.HP.COM (Kevin Montgomery) (01/16/90)

	Hiya!   

	I'm looking to build up a home unix box with my HP Vectra 
386/16MHz box and was thinking of getting a Western Digitial SCSI 
controller and a Connor (make all Compaq disks, methinks) 104 Meg 
drive.  Has anyone had any problems with any of this configuration 
under BellTech or SCO Unix?  The dealer sez he had no problems cranking
up SCO using it.  Any advice?  Howz $786 for the drive and controller
sound?

	Also, which do people like better- BellTech or SCO unix?  What
are the diffs?  I currently have BellTech, but can get a copy of SCO if
it looks worthwhile.  Do either have 387 support?  (and trap if none
present?)

				bigtime adv -thanks- ance,
				  kevin

larry@nstar.UUCP (Larry Snyder) (01/16/90)

> 	Also, which do people like better- BellTech or SCO unix?  What
> are the diffs?  I currently have BellTech, but can get a copy of SCO if
> it looks worthwhile.  Do either have 387 support?  (and trap if none
> present?)

I haven't tried BellTech or SCO Unix - but I have tried and am running
Interactive Unix which I runs very well.  I admit, it took some time to
get the system fully "tweaked" - but she's running - and very solid.    

SCO Unix has the "Acer" file system - which is supposed to be almost
as fast as what is being used with the ISC product.   

Whatever your choice, if you plan to be doing some heavy IO, you might
want to consider a smart serial board to keep the primary CPU from becoming
bogged down doing IO.
-- 
          Larry Snyder, Northern Star Communications, Notre Dame, IN USA 
                uucp: larry@nstar -or- ...!iuvax!ndmath!nstar!larry