brad@microm.UUCP (Bradley W. Fisher) (02/26/90)
I have a situation with a 386 clone running ISC 2.0.2, and has two
Bell Technologies ICC 6 port cards installed. I've seen threads
about these cards (and the lack of info/support for them) and just
have one quick question.
One or the other of the boards locks up occasionally, maybe once a
day ... and I noticed (through visual inspection) that although their
addressing switches are different, they are both set to interupt 10.
Is this correct for two cards? Most of my work has been with other cards
under SCO, and I can't say that using the same interupts sounds right to
me.
Of course, there's no docs onsite, and ISC from what I've seen doesn't
give one much flexibility on peripheral installation setups, so ....
Does anyone know if IRQ 10 is correct for both boards?
Thanks in advance ....
--
I'm just a wanna be UNIX guru (IJWBUG) | Micro Maintenance, Inc.
| 2465 W. 12th St. #6
-== Brad Fisher ==- | Tempe, Arizona 85281
...!asuvax!mcdphx!hrc!microm | 602/894-5526mark@gizzmo.UUCP (mark hilliard) (02/27/90)
In article <255@microm.UUCP> brad@microm.UUCP (Bradley W. Fisher) writes: > >Does anyone know if IRQ 10 is correct for both boards? I am using several ICC cards under 2.02. The ICC has the capability of sharing one IRQ, and if they work under 10, then it is set up correctly. When the system boots, you will get a ICC download message if the cards are working. Contact INTEL for documentation for the boards, as they bought out Bell Tech. Mark Hilliard N2HHR