mason@oct1.UUCP (David Mason) (05/01/90)
In article <836@sixhub.UUCP> davidsen@sixhub.UUCP (Wm E. Davidsen Jr) writes: >In article <1990Apr26.130747.6047@virtech.uucp> cpcahil@virtech.UUCP (Conor P. Cahill) writes: > >| Several quotes about the "need" for comp.unix.sco were quoted in >| this article. It appears to me that most of them were from SCO. Cahill's incoming mail looks somewhat like the result of some sort of internal office memo at SCO saying "get out there and post `Viva comp.unix.sco' ". However, I think it is important to keep the issues in perspective at this stage. Cahill's posting may have been provocative, but the issue is still comp.unix.sco. Let's vote about that, not Cahill's style. This is strictly my opinion. -------------------- David | mason@oct1 (David Mason) | ...!uunet!ddsw1!olsa99!oct1!mason
cpcahil@virtech.uucp (Conor P. Cahill) (05/08/90)
In article <1990May1.161300.8249@oct1.UUCP> mason@oct1.UUCP (David M. Mason) writes: >In article <836@sixhub.UUCP> davidsen@sixhub.UUCP (Wm E. Davidsen Jr) >writes: >>In article <1990Apr26.130747.6047@virtech.uucp> cpcahil@virtech.UUCP >(Conor P. Cahill) writes: >> >>| Several quotes about the "need" for comp.unix.sco were quoted in >>| this article. It appears to me that most of them were from SCO. > >Cahill's incoming mail looks somewhat like the result of some sort of >internal office memo at SCO saying "get out there and post `Viva >comp.unix.sco' ". You are reading things wrong. I pointed out that the propoganda in the second call to votes appeared to be mostly, if not all, from SCO. You should be sure to get your attributions right before posting. Besides, don't most people like to be called by thier first name? >This is strictly my opinion. Ditto. -- Conor P. Cahill (703)430-9247 Virtual Technologies, Inc., uunet!virtech!cpcahil 46030 Manekin Plaza, Suite 160 Sterling, VA 22170