tom@litle.litle.com (tom hampton) (07/03/90)
Does it work for you?
How much does it cost?
Is there some reason why you are not using ISC's vaunted
Lachman implementation?
--
===============================================================================
Tom Hampton, Mgr. New Technology, Litle & Co. | POB A218, Hanover, NH 03755
603 643 1832
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Design is about figuring out what you won't be able to do.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tom@litle.com tom@litle.uucp {backbone}!dartvax.dartmouth.edu!litle!tom
===============================================================================dougm@ico.isc.com (Doug McCallum) (07/05/90)
In article <498@litle.litle.com> tom@litle.litle.com (tom hampton) writes: >Does it work for you? > I'm not using it (for obvious reasons) but I've seen it work. > >Is there some reason why you are not using ISC's vaunted >Lachman implementation? The TCP/IP with 386/ix, or INTERACTIVE UNIX as the new release is called, doesn't use the Lachman implementation of TCP/IP although it does use the LAI NFS.
stevea@i88.isc.com (Steve Alexander) (07/06/90)
In article <498@litle.litle.com> tom@litle.litle.com (tom hampton) writes: >Is there some reason why you are not using ISC's vaunted >Lachman implementation? Vaunted or otherwise, the INTERACTIVE Host-Based TCP/IP is not derived from Lachman System V STREAMS TCP; it was developed by INTERACTIVE. INTERACTIVE's NFS *is* derived from Lachman System V NFS. -- Steve Alexander, Software Technologies Group | stevea@i88.isc.com INTERACTIVE Systems Corporation, Naperville, IL | ...!{sun,ico}!laidbak!stevea