heiser@tdw201.ed.ray.com (08/21/90)
Does anyone have anything equivalent to TOP (or u386mon) that
will compile and run properly on an ESIX system?
Bill
--
Bill Heiser
Work: heiser@tdw201.ed.ray.com
{decuac,necntc,uunet}!rayssd!tdw201!heiser
Home: Bill.Heiser@f240.n322.z1.fidonet.org (Fidonet 1:322/240)
The Think_Tank BBS (508)655-3848 1200/2400/9600-HST
Other: 75106.2332@compuserve.com
Other: heiser@world.std.com (Public Access Unix)palowoda@fiver (Bob Palowoda) (08/22/90)
From article <2174@sud509.ed.ray.com>, by heiser@tdw201.ed.ray.com: > > Does anyone have anything equivalent to TOP (or u386mon) that > will compile and run properly on an ESIX system? Yes you can download a copy of my bbs. File: umon386.tar.Z Located in the 'unix_bench' files area. ESIX binary included. Datalines in the .sig ---Bob --- -- Bob Palowoda palowoda@fiver | *Home of Fiver BBS* Home {sun}!ys2!fiver!palowoda | 415-623-8809 1200/2400 {pacbell}!indetech!fiver!palowoda | An XBBS System Work {sun,pyramid,decwrl}!megatest!palowoda| 415-623-8806 1200/2400/19.2k TB+
bob@rancor.UUCP (Bob Willcox) (08/22/90)
In article <2174@sud509.ed.ray.com> heiser@tdw201.ed.ray.com writes: >Does anyone have anything equivalent to TOP (or u386mon) that >will compile and run properly on an ESIX system? I have built and am running u386mon (v 2.20, though I have successfully used a couple of earlier versions as well) on my ESIX system (Rev D). I built it using the isc2 makefile. -- Bob Willcox ...!{rutgers|ames}!cs.utexas.edu!romp!rancor!bob Phone: 512 258-4224
heiser@tdw201.ed.ray.com (08/24/90)
In article <281@rancor.UUCP> bob@rancor.UUCP (Bob Willcox) writes: > >I have built and am running u386mon (v 2.20, though I have successfully >used a couple of earlier versions as well) on my ESIX system (Rev D). >I built it using the isc2 makefile. Hi, Based on what lots of people told me, I was able to successfully build the 2.2 version using the DELL makefile. It's funny, though, even when top is the "only" thing running on the system, it shows 100% cpu utilization. I have to experiment this weekend, killing of processes, to find out which one is being the hog. Actually, the u386mon process itself seems to rank right up there. Bill -- Bill Heiser Work: heiser@tdw201.ed.ray.com {decuac,necntc,uunet}!rayssd!tdw201!heiser Home: Bill.Heiser@f240.n322.z1.fidonet.org (Fidonet 1:322/240) The Think_Tank BBS (508)655-3848 1200/2400/9600-HST Other: 75106.2332@compuserve.com Other: heiser@world.std.com (Public Access Unix)