[sci.military] Sub Launched ICBMs

nak@cbnews.ATT.COM (Neil A. Kirby) (04/11/89)

From: nak@cbnews.ATT.COM (Neil A. Kirby)

	They aren't too far under the water when they launch, and they
    aren't standing still.  At least that's what the PR film for the
    Tomahawk showed when I saw it.  You couldn't see the sub, but the water
    wasn't still.  Who knows what shenanigans General Dynamics did when
    filming it though.

	I've read that the propellant for trident and other missiles is by
    itself quite a bomb if something bad happens to it.  If this happens 
    under water [shouldn't, rocket doesn't ignite till it gets above the
    water] say from a missile that failed and fell back, then the sub is in
    for a severe pounding, if not destruction, from the blast.  Think about
    how much energy it takes to lob a few tons of warheads halfway around
    the globe.  One heck of a depth charge, I'd say, if it went off.


    Neil Kirby
    ...cbsck!nak

maniac%garnet.Berkeley.EDU@ (George W. Herbert) (04/13/89)

From: maniac%garnet.Berkeley.EDU@ (George W. Herbert)

In article <5549@cbnews.ATT.COM> nak@cbnews.ATT.COM (Neil A. Kirby) writes:
>	I've read that the propellant for trident and other missiles is by
>    itself quite a bomb if something bad happens to it.  If this happens 
>    under water [shouldn't, rocket doesn't ignite till it gets above the
>    water] say from a missile that failed and fell back, then the sub is in
>    for a severe pounding, if not destruction, from the blast.  Think about
>    how much energy it takes to lob a few tons of warheads halfway around
>    the globe.  One heck of a depth charge, I'd say, if it went off.

By their very nature, solid fuel rockets can explode if they get cracks
in the propellant.  This is an overburning explosion, however, not a detonation.And as such, it will produce significantly less shock waves.  Probably much lessthan the pressure of water down 1200 feet.  

george william herbert
maniac@garnet.berkeley.edu

dale@cs.odu.edu (Dale Ross Maurice) (04/15/89)

From: dale@cs.odu.edu (Dale Ross Maurice)

In article <5604@cbnews.ATT.COM> maniac%garnet.Berkeley.EDU@ (George W. Herbert) writes:
:In article <5549@cbnews.ATT.COM> nak@cbnews.ATT.COM (Neil A. Kirby) writes:
:>	I've read that the propellant for trident and other missiles is by
:>    itself quite a bomb if something bad happens to it.  If this happens 
:>    under water [shouldn't, rocket doesn't ignite till it gets above the
:>    water] say from a missile that failed and fell back, then the sub is in
:>    for a severe pounding, if not destruction, from the blast.  Think about
:>    how much energy it takes to lob a few tons of warheads halfway around
:>    the globe.  One heck of a depth charge, I'd say, if it went off.
:
:By their very nature, solid fuel rockets can explode if they get cracks
:in the propellant.  This is an overburning explosion, however, not a 
:detonation.And as such, it will produce significantly less shock waves.  
:Probably much lessthan the pressure of water down 1200 feet.  

Ahh, but... If you will remember your physics you'll recall the the presure
of an explosion underwater would be greatly multiplied.

	dale
-- 
Dale Ross Maurice           |  dale@xanth.cs.odu.edu  dale@cs.odu.edu 
Old Dominion University     |  dale@xanth.uucp        [128.82.8.1]

maniac%garnet.Berkeley.EDU@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU (George W. Herbert) (04/18/89)

From: maniac%garnet.Berkeley.EDU@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU (George W. Herbert)

In article <5668@cbnews.ATT.COM> dale@cs.odu.edu (Dale Ross Maurice) writes:
>:By their very nature, solid fuel rockets can explode if they get cracks
>:in the propellant.  This is an overburning explosion, however, not a 
>:detonation.And as such, it will produce significantly less shock waves.  
>:Probably much lessthan the pressure of water down 1200 feet.  
>
>Ahh, but... If you will remember your physics you'll recall the the presure
>of an explosion underwater would be greatly multiplied.

The pressure of a deep-water explosion is so multiplied.  If the missile is
poking its nose out of the water it will vent the energy mostly that way.  And
SLBM's are launched from shallow enough that the energy should go mostly
up.  

Note that I don't claim that subs are invulnerable to such damage: i merely
want to point out that they're a lot more survivable than you might think.

george william herbert
maniac...