[sci.military] Finnish airforces

kiravuo@kampi.hut.fi (Timo Kiravuo) (06/23/89)

From: kiravuo@kampi.hut.fi (Timo Kiravuo)

In article <7632@cbnews.ATT.COM> tzung@CS.UCLA.EDU writes:

>Sweden	  JAS39    ???	single F404				crashed once

The JAS Gripen is designed for the Scandinavian needs. It is
small and designed to work on not too good runways.

This really leads me to the subject. Finnish Air Forces today. Or
rather the defence situation in air.

We have a small airforce, restricted to 60 fighting planes at
most. This was set at the peace conferences after the WWII.

It has been decided that the role of the airforce is to keep air
superiority. Ground support can be done at the spare time. This
makes sense, considering the small size of the airforce.

Since we try very hard to stay unpartial, we also like to equip
our armed froces both from the east and the west. From the east
wi have Mig 21 Bis -planes, which are getting old. From the west
we have Saab Drakens, which are outdated, too. We also have
British Hawk trainers. Then there are cargo planes, some
transport helicopters, etc. usual stuff.

Sidenote: some of our career officers have received training both
in the west and the east, makes for interesting comparisons.

In the next decade Finland has to buy a completely new set of
fighters. From the east it will possibly be the new Mig 29. From
the west there is more competition.

Swedish Jas, seems like a good possibility, but it may not be
ready in time. The US F-16 is unfit to our conditions. It is too
much high tech, requiring too much ground crew and especially too
good air fields.

This needs a bit more explanation. We can expect to use the
normal airfields oynly at the peace time. And it is very
difficult to fit a carrier in the Baltic Sea. :-) Since we have
paved highways all over the country, those will be used as
airfields at the war time. This has been tested and it works. But
this sets some requirements to the planes. For example with some
Soviet planes it is possible to direct the air intake to the top
of the wind at takeoff, to avoid debris. US planes are not
designed for this kind of operations (according to my knowledge,
might be wrong).

So, at wartime our airforce shall go hiding in the bushes. And so
shall the rest of the army, but that's another story.

The most likely choice for the new plane from the west seems to
be the new French Mirage (can't remember the model now). This
will be seen in the future.
--
Timo  Kiravuo
Helsinki University of Technology, Computing Center
kiravuo@hut.fi   kiravuo@fingate.bitnet   sorvi::kiravuo
work: 90-451 4328   home: 90-676 076