[sci.military] Musings About Naval Architecture

jkmedcal%uokmax@uokmax.uucp (Jeff Medcalf) (06/24/89)

From: Jeff Medcalf <jkmedcal%uokmax@uokmax.uucp>
The other day I saw some pictures of Jean D'Arc, the French helicopter/commando
carrier.  It seems that helicopter carriers often have their decks behind the
superstructure, with a good armament up front (I realize that these are old
ships).  Also, most "jeep carriers," or Harrier carriers if you prefer, are
built with through decks and lighter armaments (I include the Soviet Kievs here,
though they obviously do *not* have a light armament).

Now imagine a ship designed to operate VTOL aircraft and helicopters.  There
is a ski jump foreward, a long deck, with one side-mounted elevator, and then
the superstructure, within the front of which is another elevator.  Abreast of
the superstructure are CIWS mounts, torpedo tubes, 3" or 5" compact guns, and
4 skyhooks.  On the back side of the superstructure are the funnel, SAM
launcher (probably Vertical Launch), and chaff/flare launchers.

What would be the advantages and disadvantages of such an architecture as
compared to the deck in back and a full-length deck?  What about cost?  Keeping
the deck clear of exhaust?  Seaworthiness?  Efficiency?  Protection?  And of
course, would it be useful?



-- 
I dream I'm safe				jkmedcal@uokmax.UUCP
Soft and so nice 				Jeff Medcalf
Soft and so nice
It's a wonderful womb				<-The Church, "Hotel Womb"