[sci.military] Seacoast Mortars and Nukes

pierson@cimnet.dec.com (07/27/89)

From: pierson@cimnet.dec.com

SEACOAST FORTIFICATIONS of the UNITED STATES, Emanuel Raymond Lewis,
1970, 1979, discusses the coast defense mortars.  The standard ca 1900-
1910 was a 12 inch, in pits of 4 (later 2).  After WWI some railway mounts
appeared (this is in addition to the better known 16 inch railway rifles).
700 lb projectile, 15,000 yd range, 1500 fps MV.

Tampa, Fla. Fort DeSoto Park is the only site listed with seacoast mortars
still in place, having been abandoned in 1930's.  Most of the guns and mortars
were used for scrap metal during or after WWII.
===================
About Nukes, (separate topic	8)>>) one reference is US NUCLEAR WEAPONS,
by Chuck Hansen, ISBN 0617 56740-7  (If I copied it correctly).  Hansen was
involved in the "flap" in Wisconsin(?) 10 years ago over publication of
"classified" stuff on H Bombs.  He won that by demonstrating that the stuff
had already been declassified.  He has followed up with 300 "coffee table"
sized pages of history, technology and pictures on the weapons.  With LOTS
of footnotes.  Its approximately $30, I am reading a borrowed copy...

I personally heard the "nuclear hand grenade" story (throwable x meters,
lethal radius x+10 meters) ca 1960, at which point it was _always_ identified
as a joke.  The smallest yields in Hansen are on the order of 2 tons.
The smallest "weapon" was the Davy Crockett nuclear round for recoilless
rifle (I think).  ADM's (Atomic Demolition Munition) for barrier cratering,
pass blocking, etc have yields down to (below?) this range.  The smallest
discussed is clearly a two person load.  (which also may have to do with the
"two person" rule:  Weapons to be serviced, etc, by two persons, always.)

thanks
dave pierson
Digital Equipment Corporation	|The opinions are my own
600 Nickerson Rd		|The facts as true as I can manage
Marlboro, Mass
01742

daveme%tekirl.labs.tek.com@RELAY.CS.NET (Dave Mead) (07/29/89)

From: Dave Mead <daveme%tekirl.labs.tek.com@RELAY.CS.NET>

In article <8630@cbnews.ATT.COM*, pierson@cimnet.dec.com writes:
* 
* 
* From: pierson@cimnet.dec.com
* 
* SEACOAST FORTIFICATIONS of the UNITED STATES, Emanuel Raymond Lewis,
* 1970, 1979, discusses the coast defense mortars.  The standard ca 1900-
* 1910 was a 12 inch, in pits of 4 (later 2).  After WWI some railway mounts

At Fort Steven (mouth of the Columbia) we have amoung other gun fortifications
some of these "four hole" mortar pits that were later converted to "two holers".
The museum there states the reason for the down grade was that practice firings
of volleys had *killed* something like 6(?) gunners from muzzle blast con-
cussion! Kind of like dynamiting fish?

welty@lewis.crd.ge.com (richard welty) (08/04/89)

From: welty@lewis.crd.ge.com (richard welty)

In article <8675@cbnews.ATT.COM>, Dave Mead writes: 

*In article <8630@cbnews.ATT.COM*, pierson@cimnet.dec.com writes:

*At Fort Steven (mouth of the Columbia) we have amoung other gun fortifications
*some of these "four hole" mortar pits that were later converted to "two holers".
*The museum there states the reason for the down grade was that practice firings
*of volleys had *killed* something like 6(?) gunners from muzzle blast con-
*cussion! Kind of like dynamiting fish?

interesting.  the staff at the museum at the watervliet arsenal didn't
say anything about deaths amongst the crews; they merely mentioned that
you got a better rate of fire with two than four because after all four
went off at once, the crew was useless for sometime there afterward.
i didn't realize that useless == dead.

richard
-- 
richard welty    518-387-6346, GE R&D, K1-5C39, Niskayuna, New York
..!crdgw1!lewis.crd.ge.com!welty            welty@lewis.crd.ge.com
       Officer:  Do you know how fast you were going?
       Driver:   No.  The speedometer only goes up to 85

rbeville%tekig5.pen.tek.com@RELAY.CS.NET (Bob Beville) (08/09/89)

From: Bob Beville <rbeville%tekig5.pen.tek.com@RELAY.CS.NET>



	From the tour brochure of the Fort Stevens State Park:
	"BATTERY CLARK (1899) - Named for William Clark of the Lewis and Clark
	Expedition, this is the only mortar battery at Fort Stevens. Originally
	Battery Clark was armed with eight 12-inch mortars; then in 1917 four
	of the mortars were moved across the river to Battery Guenther in Fort
	Canby.  The move was made to provide mortar fire froma another location
	at the mouth of the Columbis River and to make the operation of Battery
	Clark more efficient.  With eight mortars, about thirty men were re-
	quireed to operate each pair of guns.  As a result, the gun pits were
	overcrowded, dangerous and inefficient.  The removal of four mortars
	removed these problems and about the same number of shots could be
	fired with the new arrangement..."

	The museum has a eight minute film showing the firing of these
	mortars... you can 'see' the concussion wave flow thru the gunners
	standing by with their mouths open and ears covered; the trees in
	the background get a wave-jolt, too.

	And while we are at it, the formal name for those "disappearing"
	cannon apparatus''  in the large concrete gun pits
	is the "Buffington-Crozier" DC(disappearing carriage) mount.

	SOURCES:
	_The Cape Forts_ Guardians of the Columbia_ by Marshall
	Hanft, Oregon Historical Society Press, 1986, 2nd Printing.

	_SILENT_SIEGE_II_ Japanese Attacks on North America in World War II
	by Bert Webber, Webber Research Group, 1988

	Tour Brochure, Fort Stevens State Park.

	that's -OWARI- from GLOWWORM-7-9-4
	best regards, rbeville@tekig5.PEN.TEK.COM
	Bob Beville, Tektronix, Inc., Beaverton, OR 97077

philj%tekig5.pen.tek.com@RELAY.CS.NET (Phil Jansen) (08/09/89)

From: Phil Jansen <philj%tekig5.pen.tek.com@RELAY.CS.NET>



Fort Stevens lost the crew in the pit for its first rifle firing.  The rifles
were on counterweights to raise and lower the gun; the recoil pushed the gun
back down for reloading.

The problem was that the pit originally had a concrete cover (to protect the
crew from shells[!]).  the cover confined the concussion in the pit, which
killed the crew.  After that, the Army removed the covers.

---- History --------

Fort Stevens was built during the Civil War to guard the mouth of the Columbia
River from the Confederate navy (and other navies).  The original mortars were
replaced by rifles (BIG ones) in WWII in a general US coastal defense upgrade.

Fort Stevens was the only US target (not territory) to be shelled by
enemies in WWII.  A Japanese submarine surfaced one night and took some
potshots at the Fort.  The Fort did not return fire, as that would only give
their position away (and the sub was only hitting a sand spit).

The only thing left standing at the Fort now is the hardened concrete
buildings.  Still, it's an interesting picnic spot, and a nice beach.

Phil Jansen
-- 
                          If you repeat things often enough, they become true.
Phil Jansen               If you repeat things often enough, they become true.
philj@tekig5.pen.tek.com  If you repeat things often enough, they become true.

rbeville@tekig5.PEN.TEK.COM (Bob Beville) (08/10/89)

From: rbeville@tekig5.PEN.TEK.COM (Bob Beville)

	Talking about shooting at aircraft with support from
	visual and microphone triangulation 'spotters' ...
	This reference has a photo of an apparatus with this caption:
	"Sound Locator M-2 was standard for detecting and locating
	sounds in pre-RADAR days."

	The apparatus has three 'trumpet'
	like tubes about the diameter of a tuba... they have beams or
	support members that terminate down to a pedestal post where
	some hand-crank wheels appear( for rotation and elevation
	control like the ACK-ACK gun). An operator standing on the 
	pedestal deck( he appears to rotate the thing he's standing on
	and stays put relative to the gear) looks like he's wearing 
	WW2 pilot headphone gear.  From the scale-height of this operator
	it's about 8 to 9 feet tall.  no further details discerned...
	On the mouth of the Columbia River, these could as easily help
	locate ships coming over the bar.

	The battery emplacement at Fort Stevens that was sealed over
	with guns inside was a conversion of BATTERY MISHLER into an
	HECP:  HARBOR ENTRANCE COMMAND POST.  The battery was camouflaged
	by great physical effort to look like its surroundings.  
	A salvage team wanted to scrap the guns/disappearing carriages 
	to help the war effort scrap drive... they were after the  lead
	carriage counterweights at 97,000 lbs. each; each steel gun barrel
	weighed  77,000 lbs ..... 237 tons in all!  The battery,
	built in 1897, was thought too unsound to disturb, and because
	of the Oregon rainfall, the comm  equipment would get leaked on
	through fractures in the structure.  
	The guns were left alone until long after the war...

	The Fort Stevens Museum/Gift Store has a muzzle of one of the
	huge guns on exhibit... a 10-inch one.  The rifling in the barrel
	looks to be one-half inch deep.

	my source...
	This is in Chapter 5, Coastal Defences in the Pacific Northwest
	discussing the fortifications of the Strait of Juan De Fuca,
	Puget Sound, Vancouver, Astoria, and the Columbia River... the
	forts and batteries, searchlights, tethered mines, and early RADARs.
	of:
	_SILENT_SIEGE_II, JAPANESE ATTACKS ON NORTH AMERICA IN WORLD WAR II
	Bert Webber, Webber Reasearch Group, Medford OR.

	that's -OWARI- from GLOWWORM-7-9-4
	best regards, rbeville@tekig5.PEN.TEK.COM
	Bob Beville, Tektronix, Inc., Beaverton, OR 97077

welty@lewis.crd.ge.com (richard welty) (08/12/89)

From: welty@lewis.crd.ge.com (richard welty)

In article <8892@cbnews.ATT.COM>, Phil Jansen writes: 
*Fort Stevens lost the crew in the pit for its first rifle firing.  The rifles
*were on counterweights to raise and lower the gun; the recoil pushed the gun
*back down for reloading.

ok; this was a case of deaths during a rifle firing; not during a mortar
firing, which is what i was talking about originally.  in any case, it
is clear that both the coast defense rifle and coast defense mortar
emplacments had design flaws that were only discovered after the abuse
of some of their crews.

there have been cases on battleships where crews were injured
by the fire of the big guns; my recollection is that one Admiral
partially lost sight in one eye while in the conning tower of
a Iowa class BB due to a gun firing.

*Fort Stevens was built during the Civil War to guard the mouth of the Columbia
*River from the Confederate navy (and other navies).  The original mortars were
*replaced by rifles (BIG ones) in WWII in a general US coastal defense upgrade.

the Watervliet Arsenal manufactured large numbers of 16" guns for coast
defense after WWI; most of these were ultimately scrapped later in WWII
when it was realized that they weren't going to be used.  also, many
guns built originally for the Navy were transfered to the Army as BB
construction was slowed down; i believe that this is what happened to
the 16"/50 caliber Mk IIs that were too big for the turrets in the Iowas.

richard
-- 
richard welty    518-387-6346, GE R&D, K1-5C39, Niskayuna, New York
..!crdgw1!lewis.crd.ge.com!welty            welty@lewis.crd.ge.com
    ``Lucas -- a good day's work, and home before dark''