[sci.military] Info wanted on vehicle monitoring

HARPER%ccvax.ucd.ie@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU (04/11/90)

From: HARPER%ccvax.ucd.ie@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU
Does anyone know of a system called "Lojack" (spelling may be wrong) used
in Massachusetts to track vehicles?  I assume it has been developed from
a militaryt prototype and I would be grateful if I could recive any
further information on the system.

Jerry Harper: Computer Science Dept.,University College Dublin, Dublin 4.
email: harper@ccvax.ucd.ie

wdstarr@athena.mit.edu (William December Starr) (04/12/90)

From: wdstarr@athena.mit.edu (William December Starr)

[mod.note:  I'm posting this since it answers a question asked here.
No followups, please, unless it can be tied into military topics. - Bill ]

In article <15451@cbnews.ATT.COM>, HARPER%ccvax.ucd.ie@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU said:

> Does anyone know of a system called "Lojack" (spelling may be wrong)
> used in Massachusetts to track vehicles?  I assume it has been
> developed from a militaryt prototype and I would be grateful if I
> could recive any further information on the system. 

I've got a Lo-Jack tracker in my Jeep.  The way it works is pretty
simple: if I report my car stolen, the police punch my vehiclke
identification number (aka the serial number) into their magic
computer, and it spits back the fact that I've got a Lo-Jack unit in
my car.  The cops then send out a message which causes a special radio
signal to be transmitted all over the state of Massachusetts.  When/if
my Lo-Jack unit hears that signal it will start broadcasting a "here I
am" signal of its own.  Police cars equipped with the appropriate
Lo-Jack-supplied equipment -- there's supposed to be at least one such
police car in just about every police department in the state --
listen for that signal and home in on it.

Obviously, all of the above requires a lot of cooperation from local
law enforcement, which means convincing a lot of politicians that
having all this equipment and procedure in place is (a) legal, (b)
cost-effective, (c) a good idea, etc.  The fact that Lo-Jack is a
private company that's in this for the money has contributed to some
political resistance to it, human nature being what it is.  (It didn't
help that there was a mini-scandal in Massachusetts when some public
officials who were involved in the feasability studies of the proposed
system bought some Lo-Jack stock cheap before the general public heard
about it and made a tidy profit, most of which they were eventually
forced to forfeit, I believe.)

So far, I think that the Lo-Jack people have gotten their recovery
nets installed only in Massachusetts and Florida, but I could be
mistaken. 

As for your assumption that it was all developed from a military
prototype, I have no idea.  If you're curious enough to spend money on
international postage or overseas phone calls, the pointer for Lo-Jack
is: 

Lo-Jack Corporation
639 Granite Street
Braintree, Massachusetts USA
          02184-9990

telephone: (617) 848-8810