[sci.military] New B-52s?

greg@travis.cica.indiana.edu (Gregory TRAVIS) (02/04/91)

From: greg@travis.cica.indiana.edu (Gregory TRAVIS)
  I've a crazy notion, but I've not seen it discussed before.  It goes
something like this:

	The B-52 is a rather well-proven design, having been used
in at least two major U.S. wars (Vietnam and Iraq).  In both cases, the
bomber has been extremely effective and suffered little.  Today's
30 year old G and H versions are expected to be used well into the
year 2000.  (I could be wrong about the G - is it retired?)

	Most of the concerns around B-52 longevity is centered around
airframe life, not viability on tomorrow's battlefield.  B-52s
were successfully modified for low-level bombing and retain a high-alititude
capability, as is used currently in Iraq.

	The only serious production alternative to the B-52 is the
B-1B.  The B-2 is too far away and too expensive.  However, the B-1B
is more complex (does it retain the swing-wing of the B-1?) and has
been plagued with reliability problems.  Is the B-1B capable of carrying
external stores like the B-52?  The B-1B is subsonic, like the B-52 (although
I know the original B-1 was supersonic).

	What would reviving the B-52 production line involve?  Does
the tooling still exist?  I would think that a "modern" B-52 might
have a significant cost advantage over the B-1B and, of course, the
B-2.  It should be trivial to replace the eight-engine configuration
with a more modern configuration of four high-bypass engines.  I would
think the fuel and weight savings of such a modified "new" B-52 would
make it very attractive.  My copy of Jane's lists the gross weight of
the B-1 (not B-1B) as around 400,000lbs, whereas the B-52 is around
500,000lbs.  Does the B-1B have a greater bomb capacity than the
B-52?  Would deletion of 4 of the B-52s engines make up for the
deficit?

	The military must have vast amounts of knowledge about the
B-52, versus little about the B-1B.  Little crew re-training would
be involved in the deployment of "new" B-52s, versus quite a bit
for the B-1B and even more for the B-2.

	Am I blowing smoke or is this something the Pentagon just does
not want to hear about?

--
Gregory R. Travis                Indiana University, Bloomington IN 47405
greg@cica.cica.indiana.edu       Center for Innovative Computer Applications
Disclaimer:  I heart hate email.