[sci.military] need explanations of CNN video

web@applga.aa.cad.slb.com (William Bulley) (02/04/91)

From: web@applga.aa.cad.slb.com (William Bulley)
1.) Today CNN had ITN video of cruise missles low over Baghdad.  It looked
	like the missles were jinking to avoid anti-aircraft artillary.  Could
	they be programmed to do this once they were over the city?

2.) Gun sight videos on CNN the night before showed aircraft (F-117?) taking
	out several Iraqi bridges.  The IR images of the bridges seemed to be
	very stable (i.e., not much relative ground motion) not unlike video
	from a helicopter.  The weapons platform must have been moving at a high
	rate of speed, but then why does the bridge image remain so stable?  A
	good comparison (with lots of relative ground motion) would be the video
	shots of buildings being destroyed shown during the first few days of the
	war.

-- 
William Bulley                  DOMAIN: web@aa.cad.slb.com
Schlumberger CAD/CAM            UUCP:   {sharkey,hela,lokkur}!applga!web
4251 Plymouth Road
Ann Arbor, Michigan  48106      MaBell: (313) 995-6211

fiddler@Eng.Sun.COM (Steve Hix) (02/05/91)

From: fiddler@Eng.Sun.COM (Steve Hix)

In article <1991Feb4.071724.23309@cbnews.att.com>, web@applga.aa.cad.slb.com (William Bulley) writes:
> 
> 
> From: web@applga.aa.cad.slb.com (William Bulley)
> 1.) Today CNN had ITN video of cruise missles low over Baghdad.  It looked
> 	like the missles were jinking to avoid anti-aircraft artillary.  Could
> 	they be programmed to do this once they were over the city?

Are you sure that the Tomahawk was jinking?  If the video camera was
being handheld, it would look like the missile was jumping about quite a bit
even if the cameraman was good and steady (unless he was using a Steadicam).

--
------------
  The only drawback with morning is that it comes 
    at such an inconvenient time of day.
------------

page@cod.nosc.mil (Ward C. Page) (02/06/91)

From: page@cod.nosc.mil (Ward C. Page)

In article <1991Feb5.035654.2926@cbnews.att.com> fiddler@Eng.Sun.COM (Steve Hix) writes:
>
>Are you sure that the Tomahawk was jinking?  If the video camera was
>being handheld, it would look like the missile was jumping about quite a bit
>even if the cameraman was good and steady (unless he was using a Steadicam).

The Tomahawk can detect radar emissions and will reduce its' altitude to
avoid being detected.  If the Tomahawk in the CNN video was being shot at
with radar guided guns then this may have happened.  However, it seems more
reasonable to assume that the jinking was done by the camera and not the
Tomahawk. 8)


Ward Page
Naval Ocean Systems Center
San Diego, CA