[sci.military] Sinking the Bismarck - 27 May, 1941

Tony_Buckland@mtsg.ubc.ca (05/26/91)

From: Tony_Buckland@mtsg.ubc.ca


Rather than asking fool questions this time, I'll attempt to pay my
dues by contributing a bit of research, on the Bismarck, which is a
subject that has a peculiar grasp on the minds of people of my age
group (57) who were born in the UK.  The main questions raised here
seem to have been: who torpedoed Bismarck, and to what effect; and how
severely damaged was she when she sank?

Most of this posting consists of quotes from Grenfell, "The Bismarck
Episode," Faber & Faber, London, 1948.  He tells a gripping and
detailed story.

"At 8:47 a.m., the Rodney's 16-in. guns opened the battle.  Just as the
salvo was due to fall, the King George V's guns flashed out and both
the British battleships were in action ... The Bismarck's first salvo
was a long way short.  But ... her third salvo straddled the Rodney and
nearly hit her. ... At 8:54 a.m., the Norfolk ... opened fire with her
8-in. guns ... about this time the Rodney brought her secondary
armament into action.  The Bismarck was now under the concentrated fire
of three ships, and her own gunnery efficiency was noticeably falling
off ...  It became known later that the Bismarck's main fire control
position ... was hit and destroyed fairly early in the action,
... but the mass of shells now pouring in on her would have
lowered her offensive power in any case.

"[stuff about the difficulty of accurate gunnery with the technology of
the time, plus] ... a relative wind straight towards the Bismarck.
Consequently, the clouds of brown cordite smoke that belched from the
British gun muzzles ...  were hanging irritatingly in front of the
firing ships, ...  the funnel gases added their quota. ... [Dorsetshire
arrives, but can't shoot accurately because so many shells are already
impacting on and around Bismarck].

"During this period, ten torpedoes were fired at the enemy, six by the
Rodney at 11,000 yards and four by the Norfolk at 6,000 yards.  None
were seen to hit, ... [Bismarck can't move effectively, but the British
have to keep on the move to dodge what's left of Bismarck's gunnery and
the perceived U-boat threat.  Meanwhile, Bismarck has a large fire
amidships, some guns out of action and even at maximum depression, the
back of the upper fore turrent blown back over the bridge, the 15-in.
aloft Director toppled over the side.  Rodney has missed with two more
torpedoes]

"By 10 a.m., the Bismarck was a silent, battered wreck.  Her mast was
down, her funnel had disappeared, her guns were pointing in all
directions ... Inside, she was clearly a blazing inferno, for the
bright glow of internal fires could be seen shining through numerous
shell and splinter holes in her sides.  Her men were deserting their
guns ... Captain Patterson [of King George V] would have ceased fire
earlier had he known of this, but the Bismarck's port side was so often
screened by a wall of shell splashes along her whole length that it was
none too easy to notice what was happening on board her. ... And her
flag still flew. ...  It was indeed astonishing that the Bismarck was
still afloat ... [besides shells from four ships] she had been
torpedoed by the Victorious', and the Ark Royal's aircraft.  [Rodney's
broadsides are now] hitting in her in threes and fours at a time.

"At 3,000 yards, the Rodney also fired her last two torpedoes, and one
of them was seen to hit the Bismarck amidships.  The Norfolk also fired
her remaining four torpedoes [and may have got one hit.  Ark Royal's
aircraft try for a torpedo attack, but run into the hazard of British
shell splashes all around Bismarck, which would have been lethal to fly
into.  Finally, the British ships, short of fuel and worried about
U-boats, have to turn for home] ... As Sir John steered away, he
signalled that any ship with torpedoes was to close the Bismarck and
torpedo her. [Dorsetshire alone has some left]
... At 10:20, from about 3,500 yards, [she] fired two torpedoes
at the Bismarck's starboard side, one of which exploded right under the
bridge.  [She] then steered around to her port side and fired another
torpedo from about 2,500 yards at 10:36.  This torpedo also hit.  The
shattered leviathan, her colours still flying, silently heeled over to
port, turned bottom up and disappeared beneath the waves [this doesn't
appear much like a scuttling].

[A limited number of survivors are rescued with lines and ladders, but
the weather and the U-boat threat prevent using boats.  A report of a
periscope sighting cuts the rescue attempt short.  Possible loss of the
Battle of the Atlantic has been avoided.]

Sorry for the length of this posting.  But I think interest in this
battle, 50 years ago on May 27th of this year, should justify it.