wales@ucla-cs.UUCP (07/25/84)
I have a 1984 Honda Accord LX Hatchback, which I bought about two months ago. The EPA fuel-efficiency rating of the car is 30 mpg, but I am get- ting only around 22 mpg. Yes, I know what they say -- "use this figure for comparison, your actual mileage may differ, California mileage lower" -- but I'm still curious and a bit concerned. Can anyone out there suggest a reason for this seemingly wide discrep- ancy? Specifically: (1) I have heard that a new engine will not get the rated mileage for a while, because the piston rings need time to seat properly. If so, how long should I wait till I start noticing the gas mileage rise? (2) The owner's manual advises the use of gasoline with a minimum octane rating (RON) of 91 -- which for practical purposes means "premium" or "super-unleaded" gas. I have been using "just-plain-unleaded" gas with an octane rating of 87. The engine seems to run fine (no problems with knocking, etc.), but would the difference in octane rating between "unleaded" and "super-unleaded" account for my low gas mileage? -- Rich Wales wales@UCLA-LOCUS.ARPA ...!{ihnp4,ucbvax}!ucla-cs!wales
chim@ncsu.UUCP (Bill Chimiak) (07/26/84)
The type of fuel does make a difference in my 240Z. With premium (unleaded - shucks) I will get 2 to 3 mpg better mileage than with regular (89 octane LEADED).
marcus@pyuxt.UUCP (M. G. Hand) (07/27/84)
You amaze me! You spend $X000 on a brand new car and then risk screwing up the engine to save a few cents a gallon. They don't recommend a specific octane rating to benefit the oil company, but because it is the most suitable for your engine. Good grief! marcus hand (beep! beep!) "Rule 3: Always trust Centauri!"