wales@ucla-cs.UUCP (07/25/84)
I have a 1984 Honda Accord LX Hatchback, which I bought about two months
ago. The EPA fuel-efficiency rating of the car is 30 mpg, but I am get-
ting only around 22 mpg.
Yes, I know what they say -- "use this figure for comparison, your
actual mileage may differ, California mileage lower" -- but I'm still
curious and a bit concerned.
Can anyone out there suggest a reason for this seemingly wide discrep-
ancy? Specifically:
(1) I have heard that a new engine will not get the rated mileage for a
while, because the piston rings need time to seat properly. If so,
how long should I wait till I start noticing the gas mileage rise?
(2) The owner's manual advises the use of gasoline with a minimum octane
rating (RON) of 91 -- which for practical purposes means "premium"
or "super-unleaded" gas. I have been using "just-plain-unleaded"
gas with an octane rating of 87. The engine seems to run fine (no
problems with knocking, etc.), but would the difference in octane
rating between "unleaded" and "super-unleaded" account for my low
gas mileage?
-- Rich Wales
wales@UCLA-LOCUS.ARPA
...!{ihnp4,ucbvax}!ucla-cs!waleschim@ncsu.UUCP (Bill Chimiak) (07/26/84)
The type of fuel does make a difference in my 240Z. With premium (unleaded - shucks) I will get 2 to 3 mpg better mileage than with regular (89 octane LEADED).
marcus@pyuxt.UUCP (M. G. Hand) (07/27/84)
You amaze me! You spend $X000 on a brand new car and then risk screwing up the engine to save a few cents a gallon. They don't recommend a specific octane rating to benefit the oil company, but because it is the most suitable for your engine. Good grief! marcus hand (beep! beep!) "Rule 3: Always trust Centauri!"