[net.auto] Superchargers vs. Turbo's

hal@aesat.UUCP (Hal Patnaik) (09/21/84)

Could someone please explain the difference between a supercharger
and a turbocharger?

I already know how a turbo works, so don't bother explaining that to
me, but what exactly does a supercharger do?

Hal Patnaik
{allegra,ihnp4,linus,decvax}!utzoo!aesat!hal

AES DATA, Inc.			Bus:	(416) 821-9190 x. 364
1900 Minnesota Crt.		Home:   (416) 844-1607
Mississauga, Ont.
CANADA

gvcormack@watdaisy.UUCP (Gordon V. Cormack) (09/24/84)

Superchargers and turbochargers both use a pump to increase the
pressure (hence amount) of air/fuel going into the engine.  The
only difference is that superchargers are mechanically driven
from the engine, whereas turbos are driven by turbine using exhaust
gas pressure.  Since this energy is normally lost, the turbos run
"for free" but superchargers use useful energy.  Unfortunately, there
is only a lot of exhaust gas flow to drive the turbine when the
engine is already working hard, so there is a positive feedback
problem.  This problem is characterized by a lag and then sudden
onset of power.

In summary, turbos are more efficient but superchargers can give
a much more even boost.

- Gord Cormack, University of Waterloo
 ... watdaisy!gvcormack

phil@amd.UUCP (Phil Ngai) (09/29/84)

> gas pressure.  Since this energy is normally lost, the turbos run
> "for free" but superchargers use useful energy.  Unfortunately, there
>
> - Gord Cormack, University of Waterloo
>  ... watdaisy!gvcormack

This has always seemed odd to me. Intuitively I think that the turbo
must increase the backpressure seen by the motor, which is just another
way of reducing the useful work it can do. It doesn't seem "free" to me.
-- 

 Phil Ngai (408) 982-6554
 UUCPnet: {ucbvax,decwrl,ihnp4,allegra,intelca}!amd!phil
 ARPAnet: amd!phil@decwrl.ARPA