[comp.windows.ms] User opinion on windowing environments...

bobh@tekirl.LABS.TEK.COM (Bob Hubbard) (05/27/89)

I am not a developer just a lowly "usr".  I and many of my
colleagues want to have several apps (word processing, graphics,
CAD, database, spreadsheets) "open" at once on 386 machines.  True
multitasking not necessary.  Our
choices are Windows/386 and DesqView.  We also want PC-NFS underneath.
 
We can't get that now.  It doesn't seem likely that OS/2 or anything
else will work either.  DOS may be ugly but there are so many useful
and refined applications in it that I(we) forgive many sins.

Windows/386 will allow NFS drives and printers to be mounted but
will not allow telnet sessions nor will it allow calls to be sent
to mounted printers.  Relatively small windows are allowed if NFS drivers are 
loaded before Windows.  Microsoft and Sun don't talk to each other so
there is no eminent solution.  Unusable.

DesqView/386 will do all of the above usually except for telnet sessions
and it occaisionally fouls up a print call.  It's memory manager at least
allows NFS drivers to be loaded "high" which gives much more room for 
large applications (they all seem to want 500K these days).  Usable but
clumsy.

OPINION:  I don't really think OS/2-3 is relevant.  The hardware is
moving so much faster than the software;  there are very few protected
mode apps and I don't see an avalanche soon;  there is an installed base
of DOS apps that is very sophisticated and depended on by people that
will not accept less functionality.  Windows/386 would be the eventual
winner (with improvements) except that I honestly believe that Microsoft
writes inherently buggy programs that never seem to work right with
other apps and they (MS) don't really care (extremely miopic).   QuarterDeck
seems to write better behaved systems, but text-based is just clumsy.  At
least they seem to listen to their "usrs".