[comp.windows.ms] Is there a better alternative than MS-Windows Paint program???

mark@motcsd.UUCP (Mark Jeghers) (05/08/89)

I use Paint (under Microsoft Windows) to make charts, etc.  It does not
print out very nicely, the resolution is so poor!  I send it to a postscript
laser printer and it is still big chunky blocks.  Text looks especially bad
on it.  MacPaint is much superior, but, alas, you can't run it under Windows!

Is there a "paint" type of program which meets the following criteria (more
or less)?

- Runs under MS-Windows
- Has better resolution (like 300 dpi)
- Object Oriented treatment of graphic items
  (like MacPaint, MS-Paint just treats it all as raster bitmap)
- Is preferably PD or Shareware

Please help me out here if you know!
Thanks in advance!
-- 
Mark Jeghers                       "I'm the King of Eight and I'm here to state
Motorola Computer Systems              that everything here has to total eight!
....uunet!apple!motcsd!greek!mark          The gaurds, for instance, at my gate
...hplabs!hpda!/                              must always total exactly eight!"

jimb@mas1.UUCP (Jim Burke) (05/12/89)

In article <355@greek.UUCP> mark@greek.UUCP (Mark Jeghers) writes:

>Is there a "paint" type of program which meets the following criteria (more
>or less)?

>- Runs under MS-Windows
>- Has better resolution (like 300 dpi)
>- Object Oriented treatment of graphic items
>  (like MacPaint, MS-Paint just treats it all as raster bitmap)
>- Is preferably PD or Shareware

I have a related question.  I have not found a drawing package that produces
output compatable with WordPerfect 5.0 that produces reasonable quality
printed graphics.  I use GEM Draw heavily but it is not supported.  Many
of the "paint" (bitmapped) graphics packages are more difficult to use
than GEM but even they do not produce good quality drawings when printed
inside a WP document.  Or should I expect not to find a package that is
compatible?  Is this a problem with the graphics package or with WordPerfect?

I'd appreciate any comments anyone has on their success or lack of success.

Thanx...

-- 
Jim Burke (mas1!jimb)                   Measurex Corp.
{...}pyramid!voder!mas1!jimb            One Results Way
{...}apple.com!mas1!jimb                Cupertino, CA  95014
                                        (408) 255-1500 ext. 2014

vpg@cbnewsc.ATT.COM (venu.p.gopal) (05/13/89)

In article <1866@mas1.UUCP> jimb@mas1.UUCP (Jim Burke) writes:
>I have a related question.  I have not found a drawing package that produces
>output compatable with WordPerfect 5.0 that produces reasonable quality
>printed graphics.  I use GEM Draw heavily but it is not supported.  Many
>of the "paint" (bitmapped) graphics packages are more difficult to use
>than GEM but even they do not produce good quality drawings when printed
>inside a WP document.  Or should I expect not to find a package that is
>compatible?  Is this a problem with the graphics package or with WordPerfect?

I heard from VP-Graphics (Paperback Software) people that they are trying
to work with WordPerfect developers so that WP can read VPG files.  Don't
have any idea if and when this may happen.

Another solution would have been for VP-Graphics, GEM etc. to create
encapsulated postscript (EPS) files.  WP can read these.  If GEM draw
will support HPGL output, you can also try reading this with WP.
WP will also read some type of files generated by AutoCad.

Venu P. Gopal
UUCP:	att!ihuxy!vg55611
Internet: vg55611@ihuxy.att.com
BITNET: com%"vg55611@ihuxy.att.com"   or   com%"vg55611%ihuxy@research.att.com"
Silence those silent letters and save the world 500 million keystrokes a day.

victoro@crash.cts.com (Victor O'Rear) (05/15/89)

In article <770@cbnewsc.ATT.COM> vpg@cbnewsc.ATT.COM (venu.p.gopal) writes:
>In article <1866@mas1.UUCP> jimb@mas1.UUCP (Jim Burke) writes:
>>I have a related question.  I have not found a drawing package that produces
>>output compatable with WordPerfect 5.0 that produces reasonable quality
>>printed graphics.  I use GEM Draw heavily but it is not supported.  Many
>>of the "paint" (bitmapped) graphics packages are more difficult to use
>>than GEM but even they do not produce good quality drawings when printed
>>inside a WP document.  Or should I expect not to find a package that is
>>compatible?  Is this a problem with the graphics package or with WordPerfect?
>have any idea if and when this may happen.
>
>Another solution would have been for VP-Graphics, GEM etc. to create
>encapsulated postscript (EPS) files.  WP can read these.  If GEM draw
>will support HPGL output, you can also try reading this with WP.
>WP will also read some type of files generated by AutoCad.
>
I've talked with Digital Research/GEM technical support and they say that
a new HPGL driver is in the works for GEM Output since the current one
will overlay different colors without regard for layers. IE: No hidden line
removal.  For an object orientated drawing program, this is a serious
limitation.  I would like to find something better than GEM Draw with
multiple output formats.
.

-- 
===============================================================================
|  Victor O'Rear {hplabs!hp-sdd, cbosgd, ucsd, nosc.mil}!crash!victoro       |
|  USnail: P.O. Box 3972, La Mesa, California  92044, United States of America|
|  mil : crash!victoro@nosc.ARPA and work: (619) 571-1222                    |
|                                                                             |
|  "Fools, Idiots! Don't they realize that they are dealing with forces      |
|        beyond comprehension!" - "Doctor Science"                            |
===============================================================================

carlson@gateway.mitre.org (Bruce Carlson) (05/19/89)

In article <355@greek.UUCP> mark@greek.UUCP (Mark Jeghers) writes:
>I use Paint (under Microsoft Windows) to make charts, etc.  It does not
>print out very nicely, the resolution is so poor!  I send it to a postscript
>laser printer and it is still big chunky blocks.  Text looks especially bad
>on it.  MacPaint is much superior, but, alas, you can't run it under Windows!
>Is there a "paint" type of program which meets the following criteria (more
>or less)?
>- Runs under MS-Windows
>- Has better resolution (like 300 dpi)
>- Object Oriented treatment of graphic items
>  (like MacPaint, MS-Paint just treats it all as raster bitmap)
>- Is preferably PD or Shareware
>Mark Jeghers                       "I'm the King of Eight and I'm here to state

Its not PD or shareware, but Micrographx sells Windows Draw Plus, which is
more or less of superset of the Gem Draw and MacDraw capabilities.  They also
sell a more expensive product called Designer and a top end product
that I can't recall the name for.

I have used Windows Draw (predecessor of Draw Plus) on an AT compatible with
an HP laserjet and I was extremely pleased with the results.  THe HP laserjet 
driver works at up 300 dpi with Windows if you have enough memory in the 
laserjet.
I think Windows has a postscript driver, but I'm not sure of its 
resolution or how well it works with Windows Draw Plus.  

Mail order houses have the Micrographx products, but for some reason
Egghead Software and B. Daltons Software Etc. don't carry it here in
the stores.  I called Micrographx on the phone (I think I got the 
number from an add in PC Magazine) and they sent me a description of
their product line.

Bruce Carlson

phil@diablo.amd.com (Phil Ngai) (05/23/89)

In article <53798@linus.UUCP> carlson@gateway.mitre.org (Bruce Carlson) writes:
|Its not PD or shareware, but Micrographx sells Windows Draw Plus, which is
|more or less of superset of the Gem Draw and MacDraw capabilities.  They also
|sell a more expensive product called Designer and a top end product
|that I can't recall the name for.
|
|Mail order houses have the Micrographx products, but for some reason
|Egghead Software and B. Daltons Software Etc. don't carry it here in

Around here, Egghead does carry Micrographx Designer but not Draw
Plus, although they can probably special order it. Is there anyone
familiar with both Designer and Draw Plus who could comment on how the
two products compare? 
--
Phil Ngai, phil@diablo.amd.com		{uunet,decwrl,ucbvax}!amdcad!phil
"In California, the reward for saving water is a lower quota."

ronnie@xroads.UUCP (Ronnie Phillips) (05/29/89)

In article <25713@amdcad.AMD.COM> phil@diablo.AMD.COM (Phil Ngai) writes:
>In article <53798@linus.UUCP> carlson@gateway.mitre.org (Bruce Carlson) writes:
>|Its not PD or shareware, but Micrographx sells Windows Draw Plus, which is
>|more or less of superset of the Gem Draw and MacDraw capabilities.  They also
>|sell a more expensive product called Designer and a top end product
>|that I can't recall the name for.

Actually the BEST graphics program I've seen for the IBM is a program
called Arts & Letters by Computer Support Corporation.  It runs out
of Windows and has more capability than MacDraw on the Mac.  It will
do all the splines and curves you want plus add points to them so
you can stretch and manipulate them to your desires.

One of the extra features it supports is the ability to convert
text to graphic format so you can stretch and/or redesign text
for a special logo .....  It also comes packed with over 1000
basic shapes which can be combined or used as a starting point
for your current drawing.

It is probablly equivalent to Gem's new ARTLINE program which I've
seen advertised (although I've not been able to try out Artline to
make any personal comparisons).

Arts & Letters retails for $695.00, but if anyone is interested or
can't find it locally I can probably get them a discount on it.

-Ronnie


-- 
\  /  C r o s s r o a d s  C o m m u n i c a t i o n s
 /\   (602) 941-2005 300|1200 Baud 24 hrs/day
/  \  hplabs!hp-sdd!crash!xroads!ronnie