keegan-edward@cs.yale.edu (Edward Keegan) (12/12/89)
Does anyone (like MicroSoft for instance if they read this) have
an update to Windows 286/386 for the terminal application that permits
a baud rate of 9600?
--
+-----------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| Edward T. Keegan, Director | UUCP: yale!Keegan-Edward |
| Development and Operations | ARPA: Keegan-Edward@cs.yale.edu |
| Computer Science Department | BITNET: Keegan-Edward@YaleCS.BITNET |
| Yale University | VOICE: 1-203-432-1254 |
| Arthur K. Watson Hall | FAX: 1-203-432-0593 |
| 51 Prospect St., Room 009 | USPS: P.O.Box 2158, Yale Station |
| New Haven, CT 06520-2158 | New Haven, CT 06520 |
+-----------------------------+-------------------------------------+pdavid@polyslo.CalPoly.EDU (Erbivore) (12/13/89)
keegan-edward@cs.yale.edu (Edward Keegan) would have us believe: >Does anyone (like MicroSoft for instance if they read this) have >an update to Windows 286/386 for the terminal application that permits >a baud rate of 9600? In this same vein, does anyone know how to tell a windows terminal app to talk to COM3:, which is used by many internal modems for machines that already have two serial ports? -Paul. -- Paul C. David pdavid@polyslo.CalPoly.EDU California Polytechic State University, San Luis Obispo "Without its software, a computer is basically a useless lump of metal" - Andy Tanenbaum
papa@pollux.usc.edu (Marco Papa) (12/13/89)
>keegan-edward@cs.yale.edu (Edward Keegan) says: >>Does anyone (like MicroSoft for instance if they read this) have >>an update to Windows 286/386 for the terminal application that permits >>a baud rate of 9600? What is the "terminal application" you're talking about? I've used baud rates up to 19,200 with my own MS-Windows comm program with no problem. -- Marco -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= [.signature under contruction] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
kleonard@gvlv2.GVL.Unisys.COM (Ken Leonard) (12/14/89)
In article <8167@cs.yale.edu> keegan-edward@cs.yale.edu (Edward Keegan) writes:
* Does anyone (like MicroSoft for instance if they read this) have
* an update to Windows 286/386 for the terminal application that permits
* a baud rate of 9600?
Try using Procomm, version 2.4.3. It runs 9600 bps _even_in_background_
under Windows/286 and 386, even doing blocked/windowed (i.e. damn-near
maximum possible activity) file transfers.
----------------------
regardz,
Kenoppenhei@umd5.umd.edu (Richard Oppenheimer) (12/19/89)
In article <1989Dec13.063712.25818@polyslo.CalPoly.EDU> pdavid@polyslo.CalPoly.EDU (Erbivore) writes: >keegan-edward@cs.yale.edu (Edward Keegan) would have us believe: >>Does anyone (like MicroSoft for instance if they read this) have >>an update to Windows 286/386 for the terminal application that permits >>a baud rate of 9600? > > In this same vein, does anyone know how to tell a > windows terminal app to talk to COM3:, which is > used by many internal modems for machines that > already have two serial ports? > -Paul. > >-- >Paul C. David pdavid@polyslo.CalPoly.EDU Alas there is no solution at this time. I spoke to MS about the COM3: problem recently. Apparently alot of people have. They could not give me a answer whether or not it would be supported by the time version 3 is out. We can only hope!!!! I know it is still not supported under 2.11 Richard Oppenheimer oppenhei@umd5.umd.edu Computer Science Center University of Marland, College Park