[comp.windows.ms] Windows 3 and ATI card

zech@leadsv.UUCP (Bill Zech) (05/25/90)

In article <20071@grebyn.com>, ted@grebyn.com (Ted Holden) writes:
> 
> Here's what I'm seeing;  maybe somebody else is seeing something
> different.  Windows 3 gives you a standard choice of about 5 monitors,
> EGA, VGA, Hercules...  You go to load the ATI driver at the "other"
> choice, and the first thing you see is a note that 386 enhanced mode
> will not run with this card (and you'll probably get this message
> with any SVGA).  The next thing I see, after going through the entire
> five diskette setup process, is that Windows 3 simply doesn't work with
> the ATI card.  win.com simply goes "poof" and dumps you back out at a
> DOS prompt.  Right now, UNIX and X-11 are starting to look AWFULLY good.
> 

I just installed Win 3.0 on my system today, with an ATI VGA Wonder.
I let Windows choose the VGA driver and mouse for me, and it all 
works just fine.  (this is 640x480x16)

I look forward to seeing an SVGA driver for it, but I think ATI
will have to supply it.  For now I am happy with the standard
VGA mode.  (My system is a 386 25Mhz / 8 meg;  I was running Win/3
for 386 enhanced mode.)

- Bill

P.S.  I think it looks slick and am eager to play with it!

akm@cacofonix.cs.uoregon.edu (Anant Kartik Mithal) (05/25/90)

In article <1990May24.151357.18143@bigsur.uucp> andrzej@bigsur.UUCP (Andrzej Bieszczad) writes:
>2. Does anybody know about any plans on behalf of Digitalk to ship
>   Smaltalk V/Win3.0? How soon?

I wrote to Digitalk, and they toldme that they had no plans for a
Windows version of Smalltalk. Seems even more unlikely now that IBM
has decided that Smalltalk/PM is to be a standard part of their
development tools.

>3. Any experience with running Smaltalk V/286 from within Win3.0? Please,
>   do share it.
>
My guess is that it will not run. I'll check once I have both Win3.0
and V/286 installed. I *believe* that the new himem.sys makes *all*
extended memory XMS memory. Also, I don't think that the virtual 86
mode of Win 3.0 will allow protected mode operations. 

Sigh... So I'll need a program that allows me tochange config.sys and
reboot any pointers? I know that some were recently put on the net.

kartik

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Anant Kartik Mithal					akm@cs.uoregon.edu
Department of Computer Science				akm@oregon.BITNET
University of Oregon					

andrzej@bigsur.UUCP (Andrzej Bieszczad) (05/25/90)

In article <1990May25.043622.13204@cs.uoregon.edu>,
akm@cacofonix.cs.uoregon.edu (Anant Kartik Mithal) writes:
> >2. Does anybody know about any plans on behalf of Digitalk to ship
> >   Smaltalk V/Win3.0? How soon?
> 
> I wrote to Digitalk, and they toldme that they had no plans for a
> Windows version of Smalltalk. Seems even more unlikely now that IBM
> has decided that Smalltalk/PM is to be a standard part of their
> development tools.
> 

Thanks for sharing info, but since I posted the question I found out that 
there is a Win3.0 version of Smalltalk V coming in the last quarter of 1990.
The information is directly from Digitalk - I called them on May 24, 1990.
Somewhere around September they will have all specs, but the fact is that
the ST V/Win will be similar to ST V/PM, but without a compiler.

Could anybody compare ACTOR with Smalltalk?

I have not managed to invoke ST V/286 from within Windows (at least so far).
There is some hope in a PIF where one may specify an amount of XMS memory
for an application. Has anybody succeeded?

Does anybody know why neither DOS Prompt nor command.com can be run on
my 386 with 4MB of memory and ATI VGA 512 video card? It gives me communicate
that there is not enough memory, which is impossible since the system shows
almost 7MB of available virtual memory. I have no problem with running any 
other DOS application and switching between them (Nota bene: IT WORKS
BEAUTIFUL, unless I try to use PIFs).

=======================================================================

Andrzej Bieszczad (Bell-Northern Research, Ltd.)  Phone: (613) 763-2259
USENET:  uunet!bnrgate!bigsur!andrzej             Fax:   (613) 763-3283
Surface: Dept. 7G12, P.O. Box 3511, Station C,
         Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1Y 4H7

=======================================================================

gyugyi@portia.Stanford.EDU (Paul Gyugyi) (05/26/90)

In article <20071@grebyn.com> ted@grebyn.com (Ted Holden) writes:
>
>Here's what I'm seeing;  maybe somebody else is seeing something
>different.  Windows 3 gives you a standard choice of about 5 monitors,
>EGA, VGA, Hercules...  You go to load the ATI driver at the "other"
>choice, and the first thing you see is a note that 386 enhanced mode
>will not run with this card (and you'll probably get this message
>with any SVGA).  The next thing I see, after going through the entire
>five diskette setup process, is that Windows 3 simply doesn't work with
>the ATI card.  win.com simply goes "poof" and dumps you back out at a
>DOS prompt.  Right now, UNIX and X-11 are starting to look AWFULLY good.
>
>
>Ted Holden
>HTE
I'm not surprised.  I dumped my ATI card for a Video7 1024i card, and
have reaped the benifits already.  I got the new drivers which support
svga, and work in /3 mode, yesterday.  ATI had lousy support for Win/386
when it came out.
-Paul Gyugyi
gyugyi@portia.stanford.edu

jwh@flam.ifs.umich.edu (Jim Howe) (05/29/90)

In article <1990May25.043622.13204@cs.uoregon.edu>,
akm@cacofonix.cs.uoregon.edu (Anant Kartik Mithal) writes:
|> In article <1990May24.151357.18143@bigsur.uucp> andrzej@bigsur.UUCP
(Andrzej Bieszczad) writes:
|> >2. Does anybody know about any plans on behalf of Digitalk to ship
|> >   Smaltalk V/Win3.0? How soon?
|> 
|> I wrote to Digitalk, and they toldme that they had no plans for a
|> Windows version of Smalltalk. Seems even more unlikely now that IBM
|> has decided that Smalltalk/PM is to be a standard part of their
|> development tools.

I've heard that Digitalk is planning on shipping a version of Smalltalk
V for Windows 3.0
by the end of the year.  It is supposed to be a subset of what they
offer for PM.  This
information came from the AIEXPERT forum on Compuserve.  I believe the
message was from Dan
Goldman, a VP at Digitalk.

James W. Howe			   internet: jwh@ifs.umich.edu
University of Michigan             uucp:     uunet!mailrus!ifs.umich.edu!jwh
Ann Arbor, MI   48103-4943