[comp.windows.ms] PC-NFS and Windows 3.0

rodrigol@ulrik.uio.no (Rodrigo Lopez) (07/04/90)

I'm new to this conferebce so please ignore my faults. I've been watching
this newgroup for some time and enjoyed very much its content. I got 
WIndows 3.0 about 2 weeks ago and...boy does its feel right! But, I'm having
some problems trying to get our Pc-Nfs network to survive windows 3.0 in 386
enhanced mode. The network software behaves very well in standard mode, but as
soon as I run win/3 the network dies. Maybe I should describe our system in
short: Mitac 2386 (386sx), 5 Mb Ram, Paradise VGA, EtherLink II TP, 2 x serial,
...and the rest you all know.
I managed to get Pc-Nfs to work nicely under Windows/386, so I can't see 
what the problem may be. Another matter I would like to know about is the
availability of Windows 3.0 drivers for the Paradise VGA Plus Card 800x600.
The drivers that came with the machines work in Standard mode but the
scroll bars, push boxes (the whole of the new windows look goes away),
are displayed in good old windows 2.x fashion.

Reply as follow up or to:

rodrigol@ulrik.uio.no

Thank you all very much!

pilger@uhunix1.uhcc.Hawaii.Edu (Eric Pilger) (09/05/90)

So far, PC-NFS and Windows 3.0 work fairly well together.  One strange
thing that has happened (occassionally) is that after finding all the
applications on a network disk during an installation, the control
panel just aborts.  No error messages, it's as if I simply hit
<cancel>.  This happens just after it's found all the applications,
and before I get a chance to pick the ones I want.  Anybody have a
clue to this odd behavior?

In a second, possibly unrelated issue.  Has anyway seen any instances
of Word for Windows garbaging large files.  I have someone attempting
to edit a 40+ page document.  Things will go fine for a few days them,
wham!  No more useable document.  The junking ususally occurs near the
end of the file.  This is all on a 286, and with a fairly naive user.
I can't guarentee he isn't doing something crazy, but it doesn't speak
well for the robustness of Word for Windows.

Thanks in advance for any help.


				  Eric Pilger
				  NASA Infrared Telescope Facility

CC65SRAD@MIAMIU.BITNET (09/10/90)

Eric,
I have beed using Word for Windows for quite some time, and have edited some
large files.  The problem may lie in the fact that Windows is VERY straining
on a hard disk.  It is a good practice to run CHKDSK /F every time you start
the machine, and to use a program like Disk Doctor often, as well as a
disk compression program at regular intervals.
I added CHKDSK to my AUTOEXEC.BAT file, and perform a Disk Test and compression
as part of my bi-weekly backup routine.  Windows pushes a 286 system to its
limits, I'm sure, and the only way to prevent failures is to practice good
system management straight from the textbooks.
-Chris