[comp.windows.ms] a question for comp.windows.ms.internals

dorsai@pawl.rpi.edu (G. Donald Moncreaff) (09/14/90)

how inteligent is the windows scheduler?  does every application
get a full time slice reguardless of whether or not it is actually
doing anything.  are window refreshes part of the applications 
responsibility or are they performed by the windows enviornment.  can
windows applications tell the scheduler that they are inactive so that
windows doesn't wast a whole timeslice on idle processes?  is there any
way to better configure the system than the defualt configuration in 
the control panels 386 box?

am i dreaming of windows 3.1, 3.2 or 4.0?
-- 
respectfully yours,
                                                Gregory D. Moncreaff
                                                dorsai@pawl.rpi.edu
--- Assassination is the highest form of public service ---