jssk@cbnewsl.att.com (jeffrey.s.skelton) (09/20/90)
I had a pre-release version of the SDK and it apparently is missing some definitions in the windows.h header and the "released" readme files. Could somebody send these to me? As usual, make me an offer and I'll let the "closest" person know who they are so I'm not bombarded with thousands of these. And, thanks in advance... ================================================================ | Jeffrey Skelton | AT&Tnet: +1 201 271 1513 | | AT&T Bell Laboratories | Internet: jeff@tarpon.att.com | | 580 Howard Avenue | UUCP: {...att...}!tarpon!jeff | | Somerset, NJ 08873 | ATTMAIL: attmail!jskelton | ================================================================ *affiliation given for identification reasons only - I am not an official or secret agent of AT&T.
papa@pollux.usc.edu (Marco Papa) (09/21/90)
In article <1990Sep20.013856.18632@cbnewsl.att.com> jssk@cbnewsl.att.com (jeffrey.s.skelton) writes: |I had a pre-release version of the SDK and it apparently is missing |some definitions in the windows.h header and the "released" readme |files. Could somebody send these to me? |As usual, make me an offer and I'll let the "closest" person know |who they are so I'm not bombarded with thousands of these. |And, thanks in advance... |================================================================ || Jeffrey Skelton | AT&Tnet: +1 201 271 1513 | || AT&T Bell Laboratories | Internet: jeff@tarpon.att.com | || 580 Howard Avenue | UUCP: {...att...}!tarpon!jeff | || Somerset, NJ 08873 | ATTMAIL: attmail!jskelton | |================================================================ |*affiliation given for identification reasons only - I am not an |official or secret agent of AT&T. If you have a "pre-release" version, then what you are asking is clearly "illegal". May I suggest anybody thinking about mailing such "copyrighted" software as windows.h to read their licensing agreements. BTW, your postmaster will be informed that you are using ATT machines for illegal activities. Take care :-) -- Marco -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= "Xerox sues somebody for copying?" -- David Letterman -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
jssk@cbnewsl.att.com (jeffrey.s.skelton) (09/25/90)
In article <27225@usc.edu>, papa@pollux.usc.edu (Marco Papa) writes: > In article <1990Sep20.013856.18632@cbnewsl.att.com> jssk@cbnewsl.att.com > |I had a pre-release version of the SDK and it apparently is missing > |some definitions in the windows.h header and the "released" readme > |files. Could somebody send these to me? > > If you have a "pre-release" version, then what you are asking is clearly > "illegal". May I suggest anybody thinking about mailing such "copyrighted" > software as windows.h to read their licensing agreements. BTW, your > postmaster will be informed that you are using ATT machines for illegal > activities. Take care :-) > > -- Marco > -- > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > "Xerox sues somebody for copying?" -- David Letterman > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Point well taken. Actually all I'm interested in is the values of the WM_DROPOBJECT, etc messages used for communication between the Program Manager and File Manager (the undocumented ones discussed in the trash can thread). They were defined in the earlier pre-releases and then disappeared in the final pre-release. I found the earlier windows.h, so the header is not needed, but I still have an interest in the sections of the readme that mention this. Jeff Skelton