mitsolid@acf5.NYU.EDU (Thanasis Mitsolides) (01/10/91)
cpa@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au (Christopher P Avram) writes: >Windows 3.0 Video Speed Tests >Windows 386 Enhanced mode >Driver Line Rectangle Ellipse BitBlt StretchBlt Scroll Fill >Tseng 1024x768x16 3.9 17.0 70.9 7.1 108.8 9.3 80.9 The results are in Msec/operation. And here are my results, also in Msec/operation: Driver Line Rectangle Ellipse BitBlt StretchBlt Scroll Fill Paradise 1024x768x16 7.7 18.7 104.4 29.7 164.0 29.8 58.1 > >Using: PC Magazine DispInfo Version 1.2 > by Charles Petzold 1986 > >Processor: 386 AT Bus clone; No co-processor; > 8 Mbytes Memory; no cache; 25MHz >Video card: a Tseng Labs 3000 clone >Video Memory: 512 Kbytes >Video Bus: 8 bit >Shadow Ram enabled. I use the same software but 386SX/16Mhz system, Paradise 16bit card with 512K. >* NOTE: The test is performed in a window whose size is >set to 60 system font characters wide and 20 system font >characters high. The Tseng drivers install by default using >a large system font (8514), so area based operations operate on >a large screen area. The fonts available are for 640x480 or >1024x760 but 800x600 is between. When in 800x600 mode, I have >run the tests with both system fonts. Right. I also use the 8514/A fonts. Conclusion: It seems that the paradise at 16bits is much slower than the tseng at 8 bits. Most annoying weaknes is scrolling. Scrolling a window is AMAZINGLY slow using the Paradise card! Thanasis ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Internet: mitsolid@cs.nyu.edu (mitsolid%cs.nyu.edu@relay.cs.net) UUCP : ...!uunet!cmcl2!cs!mitsolid ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Internet: mitsolid@cs.nyu.edu (mitsolid%cs.nyu.edu@relay.cs.net) UUCP : ...!uunet!cmcl2!cs!mitsolid -------------------------------------------------------------------------------