hardiman@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Paul V Hardiman) (01/12/91)
From uwm.edu!rpi!julius.cs.uiuc.edu!usc!trwind!venice!ries Fri Jan 11 12:04:04 CST 1991 Article: 8693 of comp.windows.ms Path: uwm.edu!rpi!julius.cs.uiuc.edu!usc!trwind!venice!ries From: ries@venice.SEDD.TRW.COM (Marc Ries) Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms Subject: Review of the ATM fonts posted Summary: not bad for free Message-ID: <950@venice.SEDD.TRW.COM> Date: 11 Jan 91 15:35:28 GMT Reply-To: ries@venice.sedd.trw.com (Marc Ries) Organization: N/A Lines: 15 > I got the three "ATM" Windows compatible fonts from cira, unzipped them, and > loaded them into ATM without a hitch or w/o doing anything else. > The "architect" font is very nice. I also have Adobe's Tekton font. > Without close examination, they both look very equal. For the price, > "architect" looks great. > The BlackChancery font appears to be a very nice "script/calligraphic" font > for those fancy occasions. > The SanFrancisco font is, well, weird. It looks more like the "ransom" > font available for Metafont. Not too useful except for blackmail 8-). On my system the descender of the 'q' in Architect is noticeably thicker than any part of any other character. I'm running WIN3, ATM, and a H-P LJII with an Adobe cartridge. I was printing some samples of the fonts via Windows Write.