[comp.windows.ms] MicroEmacs for Windows....

ayman@eecs.umich.edu (03/15/91)

It would have been nice if the emacs window had a fixed size (80x24 is the
standard for terminals and for the X Windows version.) Is it possible to
make the size fixed (80x24) at startup?

- Ayman I. Kayssi (ayman@eecs.umich.edu)
- Advanced Computer Architecture Lab.
- EECS Dept., Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor

rspangle@jarthur.Claremont.EDU (Froot Loop) (03/15/91)

     I agree that perhaps MicroEmacs should have a specifiable size on
startup, but perhaps the exact dimensions could be set via an options dialog
box.

     I'd also like to see a choice for font, perhaps something smaller like
the two that WinQVT uses for its normal and condensed fonts (or at worst,
8-point Courier).  This way I could get more lines of text on screen at
once, or use less real estate.

     In any case, I find MicroEmacs for Windows very useful.  Keep up the
good work.

-- 
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   Randy Spangler                   |   Get your mind out of the gutter   |
|   rspangle@jarthur.claremont.edu   |   you're blocking my periscope      |
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------

poffen@sj.ate.slb.com (Russ Poffenberger) (03/16/91)

In article <11227@jarthur.Claremont.EDU> rspangle@jarthur.Claremont.EDU (Froot Loop) writes:
>
>     I agree that perhaps MicroEmacs should have a specifiable size on
>startup, but perhaps the exact dimensions could be set via an options dialog
>box.
>
>     I'd also like to see a choice for font, perhaps something smaller like
>the two that WinQVT uses for its normal and condensed fonts (or at worst,
>8-point Courier).  This way I could get more lines of text on screen at
>once, or use less real estate.
>
>     In any case, I find MicroEmacs for Windows very useful.  Keep up the
>good work.
>

I too am very impressed. It even handles large files. (Tried a 250Kb one.)

Keep on top of it!

Russ Poffenberger               DOMAIN: poffen@sj.ate.slb.com
Schlumberger Technologies       UUCP:   {uunet,decwrl,amdahl}!sjsca4!poffen
1601 Technology Drive		CIS:	72401,276
San Jose, Ca. 95110             (408)437-5254

scott@cs.hw.ac.uk (Scott Telford) (03/16/91)

In article <1991Mar15.220555.29028@sj.ate.slb.com> poffen@SunOS (Russ Poffenberger) writes:
>In article <11227@jarthur.Claremont.EDU> rspangle@jarthur.Claremont.EDU (Froot Loop) writes:
>>     I agree that perhaps MicroEmacs should have a specifiable size on
>>startup, but perhaps the exact dimensions could be set via an options dialog
>>box.
>>     I'd also like to see a choice for font, perhaps something smaller like
>>the two that WinQVT uses for its normal and condensed fonts (or at worst,
>>8-point Courier).  This way I could get more lines of text on screen at
>>once, or use less real estate.
>
>I too am very impressed. It even handles large files. (Tried a 250Kb one.)

Some way of setting fonts and window size would be nice. What would be
nicer would some proper documentation for the Windows version, and the
source code. It ain't shareware, so where's the source?

And a prettier icon would be nice too :-)

BTW. I think ordinary DOS uEMACS can just about handle 250k files on a 640k
PC. I'll be impressed if Windows uEMACS can handle *really* big files.
 _____________________________________________________________________________
| Scott Telford, Dept of Computer Science,               scott@cs.hw.ac.uk    |
| Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK.                 scott%hwcs@ukc.uucp  |
|_____ "Expect the unexpected." (The Hitch-Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy) ______|

cadsi@ccad.uiowa.edu (CADSI) (03/18/91)

From article <2539@odin.cs.hw.ac.uk>, by scott@cs.hw.ac.uk (Scott Telford):
> In article <1991Mar15.220555.29028@sj.ate.slb.com> poffen@SunOS (Russ Poffenberger) writes:
> 
> Some way of setting fonts and window size would be nice. What would be
> nicer would some proper documentation for the Windows version, and the
> source code. It ain't shareware, so where's the source?

It ain't public domain either.  Its copyright'ed.
Check the About box, then the author of the port (he lists stuff in
the about box) for source.

> 
> And a prettier icon would be nice too :-)
> 

Make your own.


|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|Tom Hite					|  The views expressed by me |
|Manager, Product development			|  are mine, not necessarily |
|CADSI (Computer Aided Design Software Inc.	|  the views of CADSI.       |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|

scott@cs.hw.ac.uk (Scott Telford) (03/19/91)

In article <1991Mar18.025027.20867@ccad.uiowa.edu> cadsi@ccad.uiowa.edu
(CADSI) writes:
>From article <2539@odin.cs.hw.ac.uk>, by scott@cs.hw.ac.uk (Scott Telford):
>> Some way of setting fonts and window size would be nice. What would be
>> nicer would some proper documentation for the Windows version, and the
>> source code. It ain't shareware, so where's the source?
>
>It ain't public domain either.  Its copyright'ed.
>Check the About box, then the author of the port (he lists stuff in
>the about box) for source.

Copyright doesn't mean you can't distribute the source. All previous
versions of MicroEMACS have been copyrighted *and* had the source
available (and have usually been distributed as source-only). The
"About..." box just gives the uEMACS for Windows author's name (can't
remember it right now, but it sounded French) but doesn't say anything
about how to get the source for the Windows version.

>> And a prettier icon would be nice too :-)
>> 
>
>Make your own.

I *have* got my own (for Program Manager) ;-) But if I remember correctly,
you can't change the desktop (Minimized) icon to anything other than the
built-in one (for a Windows app) or the DOS-box icon (for a DOS app).
 _____________________________________________________________________________
| Scott Telford, Dept of Computer Science,               scott@cs.hw.ac.uk    |
| Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK.                 scott%hwcs@ukc.uucp  |
|_____ "Expect the unexpected." (The Hitch-Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy) ______|

bg11+@andrew.cmu.edu (Brian E. Gallew) (03/19/91)

What about having the CMODE work as in Unix (i.e. hitting the tab key
while on a line automatically moves the entire line to it's correct
place)?


                                  -Brian

You drop the bomb -more-
It goes off... -more-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am *NOT* as think as you dumb I am!! |  This space for rent (241-6939)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

m1phm02@fed.frb.gov (Patrick H. McAllister) (03/20/91)

In article <2539@odin.cs.hw.ac.uk> scott@cs.hw.ac.uk (Scott Telford) writes:

   In article <1991Mar15.220555.29028@sj.ate.slb.com> poffen@SunOS (Russ Poffenberger) writes:
   >In article <11227@jarthur.Claremont.EDU> rspangle@jarthur.Claremont.EDU (Froot Loop) writes:
   >>     I agree that perhaps MicroEmacs should have a specifiable size on
   >>startup, but perhaps the exact dimensions could be set via an options dialog
   >>box.
   >>     I'd also like to see a choice for font, perhaps something smaller like
   >>the two that WinQVT uses for its normal and condensed fonts (or at worst,
   >>8-point Courier).  This way I could get more lines of text on screen at
   >>once, or use less real estate.
   >
   >I too am very impressed. It even handles large files. (Tried a 250Kb one.)

   Some way of setting fonts and window size would be nice. What would be
   nicer would some proper documentation for the Windows version, and the
   source code. It ain't shareware, so where's the source?

Try using Aporia as your shell. It lets you set startup window size for any
application. I agree with you about the need for documentation. What I miss
most, however, is subprocess execution. One of the best features of GNU
emacs on my Sun is the way it handles compilers, etc.; it is particularly
nice to be able to define an emacs command to, say, run the current buffer
through TeX and look at the messages. I was hoping for some of this
functionality in uEmacs under Windows -- it is described in the documentation
for plain uEmacs, but seems to be missing from the Win3 version. Am I missing
something somewhere?

Pat

barryf@aix01.aix.rpi.edu (Barry B. Floyd) (03/20/91)

Is MicroEmacs "programmable" in the sense emacs can act as a message 
handler, etc.?
 

-- 
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ 
| Barry B. Floyd                   \\\       barry_floyd@mts.rpi.edu |
| Manager Information Systems - HR    \\\          usere9w9@rpitsmts |
+-Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute--------------------troy, ny 12180-+

todd@fornax.UUCP (Todd Southen) (03/20/91)

I am interested in getting micro emacs for Windows.  Does anyone know where
I can get it?  An ftp site would be preferred, or it could be e-mailed to me.

Thanks,

Todd.

viswswrn@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (V. Visweswaran) (03/21/91)

>> I am interested in getting micro emacs for Windows.  Does anyone know where
>> I can get it?  An ftp site would be preferred, or it could be e-mailed to me.

The source/binaries for MicroEmacs is available thru anonymous FTP from cica.cica.indiana.edu. It is in the directory pub/pc/win3/uploads and is 
called mewin_ok.zip. 

yow@riddler.Berkeley.EDU (Billy Yow 283-4009) (03/21/91)

>BTW. I think ordinary DOS uEMACS can just about handle 250k files on a 640k
>PC. I'll be impressed if Windows uEMACS can handle *really* big files.

Last Night (3/19/91) I loaded a 671K file and a 545K file in the uEmacs
for Windows program without any problem.  I don't know what the max file
size is but over a meg seem quite possible.  I have 8 meg on my system.

Please post the source!

					Bill Yow
					yow@sweetpea.jsc.nasa.gov 

cms2839@isc.rit.edu (a.stranger) (03/21/91)

In article <2571@odin.cs.hw.ac.uk> scott@cs.hw.ac.uk (Scott Telford) writes:
>In article <1991Mar18.025027.20867@ccad.uiowa.edu> cadsi@ccad.uiowa.edu
>(CADSI) writes:
>>> And a prettier icon would be nice too :-)
>>
>>Make your own.
>
>I *have* got my own (for Program Manager) ;-) But if I remember correctly,
>you can't change the desktop (Minimized) icon to anything other than the
>built-in one (for a Windows app) or the DOS-box icon (for a DOS app).

				you can if you have ( or have access to
) the Whitewater Resource Toolkit . don't think you can do anything
about the DOS-box icon in cases of specific programs , though , but you
should be able to change it globally ( haven't tried it ... ) . you can
definately change the icon in a windows program .


-- 
       @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
       @     "Imagination keeps the shadows away  -  Xymox      @
       @~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~@
       @       a.stranger  -  CMS2839@ritvax.isc.rit.edu        @

cadsi@ccad.uiowa.edu (CADSI) (03/21/91)

From article <2571@odin.cs.hw.ac.uk>, by scott@cs.hw.ac.uk (Scott Telford):
> In article <1991Mar18.025027.20867@ccad.uiowa.edu> cadsi@ccad.uiowa.edu
> (CADSI) writes:
> 
> Copyright doesn't mean you can't distribute the source. All previous
> versions of MicroEMACS have been copyrighted *and* had the source
> available (and have usually been distributed as source-only). The
> "About..." box just gives the uEMACS for Windows author's name (can't
> remember it right now, but it sounded French) but doesn't say anything
> about how to get the source for the Windows version.
> 

Bzzzzt..  Copyrights can take many forms.  Some require that source
code NOT be distributed freely, some allow it.  In general, unless
stated otherwise in the copyright, you are required to contact author
(copyright holder) before doing anything with source.
I say contact the author
because he doesn't have to redistribute his code at all.  The original
uEmacs author specifies that you can have HIS source code.  That says
absolutely nothing about additions.  If its just source to uEmacs,
without the Windows source, there are a couple sites.  Mail me if you want
those.

> I *have* got my own (for Program Manager) ;-) But if I remember correctly,
> you can't change the desktop (Minimized) icon to anything other than the
> built-in one (for a Windows app) or the DOS-box icon (for a DOS app).

Nope.  In order to get Windows to use your icon instead of the
application's, just change the icon in the File/Properties dialog box
of the Program Manager.
BTW, you can get lots of icons from ftp sites and bulletin boards,
in addition to making your own with publicly available utilities.


|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|Tom Hite					|  The views expressed by me |
|Manager, Product development			|  are mine, not necessarily |
|CADSI (Computer Aided Design Software Inc.	|  the views of CADSI.       |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|

yaturner@normajean.sun.com (D'arc Angel) (03/21/91)

Dan Lawrence (the author of uEmacs) and I are currently working on a port
of uEmacs to Windows. Any comments/suggestions etc. for new features would
be appreciated. Currently I am intending to use Epoch as a model for the
port.
--

Mencsh tract und Gott lacht

yaturner@corp.Sun.COM

suhonen@kunto.jyu.fi (Timo Suhonen) (03/21/91)

yow@riddler.Berkeley.EDU (Billy Yow 283-4009) writes:

   Last Night (3/19/91) I loaded a 671K file and a 545K file in the uEmacs
   for Windows program without any problem.  I don't know what the max file
   size is but over a meg seem quite possible.  I have 8 meg on my system.

Everyone is talking about uemacs for Windows.. Where could I find one??

Please mail me because I'll be out from net next two weeks and a posted 
article won't be waiting me any more...

Thnx,
--
Timo Suhonen        I am logged in, therefore I am        suhonen@nic.funet.fi
                                                          suhonen@kunto.jyu.fi
   Opinions(?) are mine (if not stolen), NOT those of Univ. of Jyvaskyla.

cadsi@ccad.uiowa.edu (CADSI) (03/22/91)

From article <1991Mar20.211005.9480@isc.rit.edu>, by cms2839@isc.rit.edu (a.stranger):
> In article <2571@odin.cs.hw.ac.uk> scott@cs.hw.ac.uk (Scott Telford) writes:
> 
> 				you can if you have ( or have access to
> ) the Whitewater Resource Toolkit . don't think you can do anything
> about the DOS-box icon in cases of specific programs , though , but you
> should be able to change it globally ( haven't tried it ... ) . you can
> definately change the icon in a windows program .

Nope.  You can have ANY icon displayed for ANY file.  For instance,
My resume is written in Windows Write.  I just create a Program Item
and specify REsume.wri as the file, and use write.exe as the icon file.
This is what Icons are for.  For DOS programs, the some holds true.  Just
change the icon in the File/Properties dialog.  If you wanna use an
icon from another program, just specify that program's .exe file in the
icon file name part.


|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|Tom Hite					|  The views expressed by me |
|Manager, Product development			|  are mine, not necessarily |
|CADSI (Computer Aided Design Software Inc.	|  the views of CADSI.       |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|

mcl9337@aim1.tamu.edu (MARK CHRISTOPHER LOWE) (03/22/91)

So... where exactly IS uEmacs?  All I've heard is "on wuarchive" or "on
Simtel."  Please give us a break!  There are a LOT of directories on those
systems.

Mark C. "Bro!" Lowe - KB5III

cms2839@isc.rit.edu (a.stranger) (03/22/91)

In article <1991Mar21.195416.12344@ccad.uiowa.edu> cadsi@ccad.uiowa.edu (CADSI) writes:
>From article <1991Mar20.211005.9480@isc.rit.edu>, by cms2839@isc.rit.edu (a.stranger):
>> 				you can if you have ( or have access to
>> ) the Whitewater Resource Toolkit . don't think you can do anything
>> about the DOS-box icon in cases of specific programs , though , but you
>> should be able to change it globally ( haven't tried it ... ) . you can
>> definately change the icon in a windows program .
>
>Nope.  You can have ANY icon displayed for ANY file.  For instance,
>My resume is written in Windows Write.  I just create a Program Item
>and specify REsume.wri as the file, and use write.exe as the icon file.
>This is what Icons are for.  For DOS programs, the some holds true.  Just
>change the icon in the File/Properties dialog.  If you wanna use an
>icon from another program, just specify that program's .exe file in the
>icon file name part.

				the question , however , was about
changing the icon displayed when a program is minimized , which
File->Properties will NOT do , and the Whitewater Resource Toolkit will
.


-- 
       @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
       @     "Imagination keeps the shadows away  -  Xymox      @
       @~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~@
       @       a.stranger  -  CMS2839@ritvax.isc.rit.edu        @

klotz@cbnewsd.att.com (david.a.klotzbach) (03/23/91)

From article <1991Mar21.195416.12344@ccad.uiowa.edu>, by cadsi@ccad.uiowa.edu (CADSI):
> From article <1991Mar20.211005.9480@isc.rit.edu>, by cms2839@isc.rit.edu (a.stranger):
>> In article <2571@odin.cs.hw.ac.uk> scott@cs.hw.ac.uk (Scott Telford) writes:
>> 
>> about the DOS-box icon in cases of specific programs , though , but you
> 
> Nope.  You can have ANY icon displayed for ANY file.  For instance,
>   ...
> change the icon in the File/Properties dialog.  If you wanna use an
> icon from another program, just specify that program's .exe file in the
> icon file name part.
> 
 
But the problem remains that the `iconized' icon for none windows programs
still remains the obnoxious `DOS' icon. This can not be fixed by
the properties command. The only Icon that the properties command
affects is the one shown in the group. 

If you have enough memory that you have several programs `iconized' it
would be nice if the icons would be different. Of course this only 
applies to DOS commands and not to Windows commands.

poffen@sj.ate.slb.com (Russ Poffenberger) (03/23/91)

In article <1991Mar20.231011.32273@ccad.uiowa.edu> cadsi@ccad.uiowa.edu (CADSI) writes:
>From article <2571@odin.cs.hw.ac.uk>, by scott@cs.hw.ac.uk (Scott Telford):
>> In article <1991Mar18.025027.20867@ccad.uiowa.edu> cadsi@ccad.uiowa.edu
>> (CADSI) writes:
>> 
>> Copyright doesn't mean you can't distribute the source. All previous
>> versions of MicroEMACS have been copyrighted *and* had the source
>> available (and have usually been distributed as source-only). The
>> "About..." box just gives the uEMACS for Windows author's name (can't
>> remember it right now, but it sounded French) but doesn't say anything
>> about how to get the source for the Windows version.
>> 
>
>Bzzzzt..  Copyrights can take many forms.  Some require that source
>code NOT be distributed freely, some allow it.  In general, unless
>stated otherwise in the copyright, you are required to contact author
>(copyright holder) before doing anything with source.
>I say contact the author
>because he doesn't have to redistribute his code at all.  The original
>uEmacs author specifies that you can have HIS source code.  That says
>absolutely nothing about additions.  If its just source to uEmacs,
>without the Windows source, there are a couple sites.  Mail me if you want
>those.
>
>> I *have* got my own (for Program Manager) ;-) But if I remember correctly,
>> you can't change the desktop (Minimized) icon to anything other than the
>> built-in one (for a Windows app) or the DOS-box icon (for a DOS app).
>
>Nope.  In order to get Windows to use your icon instead of the
>application's, just change the icon in the File/Properties dialog box
>of the Program Manager.
>BTW, you can get lots of icons from ftp sites and bulletin boards,
>in addition to making your own with publicly available utilities.
>

To coin a phrase.. Bzzzzt. Nope. I don't know how many times this has come up,
but so many times people reply with this answer, and it just IS NOT true. I
challenge you to explain to me step by step how this is performed. What you
describe will ONLY change the icon as it appears in the MDI of program
manager. Once you actually launch (run) the program, then minimize it, it ONLY
displays the icon that was bound to the .EXE file by the resource compiler. In
fact, the application must register the icon before it will display, and
the application itself may even draw its own icon. The clock program supplied
by uSoft is an example of a program that dynamically draws its own icon.

This is why a DOS application can only get that ugly DOS icon. There is no way
to bind an icon to the DOS application like the resource compiler (comes with
SDK) can to a TRUE windows application. Windows supplies the DOS icon
internally and you can't change it.

For a windows app, if you had the .RC or .RES file, and all the other resources
needed by the app, you could possibly use the resource compiler (RC from SDK
or BC++) to change the icon.

Russ Poffenberger               DOMAIN: poffen@sj.ate.slb.com
Schlumberger Technologies       UUCP:   {uunet,decwrl,amdahl}!sjsca4!poffen
1601 Technology Drive		CIS:	72401,276
San Jose, Ca. 95110             (408)437-5254

poffen@sj.ate.slb.com (Russ Poffenberger) (03/23/91)

In article <1991Mar21.195416.12344@ccad.uiowa.edu> cadsi@ccad.uiowa.edu (CADSI) writes:
>From article <1991Mar20.211005.9480@isc.rit.edu>, by cms2839@isc.rit.edu (a.stranger):
>> In article <2571@odin.cs.hw.ac.uk> scott@cs.hw.ac.uk (Scott Telford) writes:
>> 
>> 				you can if you have ( or have access to
>> ) the Whitewater Resource Toolkit . don't think you can do anything
>> about the DOS-box icon in cases of specific programs , though , but you
>> should be able to change it globally ( haven't tried it ... ) . you can
>> definately change the icon in a windows program .
>
>Nope.  You can have ANY icon displayed for ANY file.  For instance,
>My resume is written in Windows Write.  I just create a Program Item
>and specify REsume.wri as the file, and use write.exe as the icon file.
>This is what Icons are for.  For DOS programs, the some holds true.  Just
>change the icon in the File/Properties dialog.  If you wanna use an
>icon from another program, just specify that program's .exe file in the
>icon file name part.
>
>
>|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
>|Tom Hite					|  The views expressed by me |
>|Manager, Product development			|  are mine, not necessarily |
>|CADSI (Computer Aided Design Software Inc.	|  the views of CADSI.       |
>|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|

bcw@rti.rti.org (Bruce Wright) (03/23/91)

In article <1991Mar22.183539.26218@sj.ate.slb.com>, poffen@sj.ate.slb.com (Russ Poffenberger) writes:
> [...] What you
> describe will ONLY change the icon as it appears in the MDI of program
> manager. Once you actually launch (run) the program, then minimize it, it ONLY
> displays the icon that was bound to the .EXE file by the resource compiler. In
> fact, the application must register the icon before it will display, and
> the application itself may even draw its own icon. The clock program supplied
> by uSoft is an example of a program that dynamically draws its own icon.
> 
> This is why a DOS application can only get that ugly DOS icon. There is no way
> to bind an icon to the DOS application like the resource compiler (comes with
> SDK) can to a TRUE windows application. Windows supplies the DOS icon
> internally and you can't change it.

It wouldn't have been all that hard for Microsoft to have the DOS box
accept an icon that it would supply in place of the DOS icon when the
window was minimized.  As Russ notes, it isn't difficult for an 
application to use any of several icons - or even to generate icons 
on the fly - so this really shouldn't cause any serious technical
problems.  I suspect that the reason that they didn't was either
a) not enough time to implement it along with everything else that
was going into Windows or b) they didn't think of it in time for it
to make it into the new version of Windows.  Even though Windows has
been able to run DOS apps for a long time, the earlier versions of
Windows would run only a few _very_ well-behaved and _very_ small 
apps (read: not very much commercial software) so it's probably been
only with Windows 3.0 that very many people have tried to run multiple
DOS programs at the same time.

BUT!!  This would require a code change in the DOS box code inside
Windows, to load and remember the appropriate icon for the DOS app,
and to display it rather than the DOS icon.  Without that change, 
the DOS box just displays its class icon (the infamous DOS icon)
whenever it's minimized.  I'm quite aware that there would be some
issues about how you specify an icon for a DOS program and so forth
(most likely through some mechanism in PIFEDIT), but these are really 
relatively minor problems compared to all the other things Windows 
does.  There's no way for ordinary users to do this type of thing - 
it's a programming issue that would be best addressed in the basic 
code for Windows:  grafting it on after the fact would be less 
convenient for the user and harder to program than doing it right 
in the basic OS.

In other words, this is a job for Microsoft.  Microsoft, are you
listening???

						Bruce C. Wright

cadsi@ccad.uiowa.edu (CADSI) (03/23/91)

From article <1991Mar22.164711.21207@cbnewsd.att.com>, by klotz@cbnewsd.att.com (david.a.klotzbach):
> From article <1991Mar21.195416.12344@ccad.uiowa.edu>, by cadsi@ccad.uiowa.edu (CADSI):
>  
> But the problem remains that the `iconized' icon for none windows programs
> still remains the obnoxious `DOS' icon. This can not be fixed by
> the properties command. The only Icon that the properties command
> affects is the one shown in the group. 
> 
> If you have enough memory that you have several programs `iconized' it
> would be nice if the icons would be different. Of course this only 
> applies to DOS commands and not to Windows commands.

Yup.  Nice call Tom.  I think I'll try to steal (via a Hook procedure
somehow) the drawing of DOS tasks to allow something like what you
want.  Gotta be possible!

|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|Tom Hite					|  The views expressed by me |
|Manager, Product development			|  are mine, not necessarily |
|CADSI (Computer Aided Design Software Inc.	|  the views of CADSI.       |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|

scott@cs.hw.ac.uk (Scott Telford) (03/24/91)

In article <1991Mar20.231011.32273@ccad.uiowa.edu> cadsi@ccad.uiowa.edu
(CADSI) writes:
>Bzzzzt..  Copyrights can take many forms.  Some require that source
>code NOT be distributed freely, some allow it.  In general, unless
>stated otherwise in the copyright, you are required to contact author
>(copyright holder) before doing anything with source.
>I say contact the author
>because he doesn't have to redistribute his code at all.  The original
>uEmacs author specifies that you can have HIS source code.  That says
>absolutely nothing about additions.  If its just source to uEmacs,
>without the Windows source, there are a couple sites.  Mail me if you want
>those.

Aha...but if Dave or Dan had done the right thing and *copylefted* the
uEMACS source then any author of a derivative would *have* to make the source
available and everybody would be able to hack uEMACS for Windows as much
as they liked, and the world would be a good and happy place...

Maybe copyleft didn't exist in 1985 though....

Anyway, why would anyone want to withhold the source of a derivative of
something that already has the source available? Maybe they don't want
the world to see how quick & dirty their hacks are... :^)
 _____________________________________________________________________________
| Scott Telford, Dept of Computer Science,               scott@cs.hw.ac.uk    |
| Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK.                 scott%hwcs@ukc.uucp  |
|_____ "Expect the unexpected." (The Hitch-Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy) ______|

cadsi@ccad.uiowa.edu (CADSI) (03/26/91)

From article <2611@odin.cs.hw.ac.uk>, by scott@cs.hw.ac.uk (Scott Telford):
> 
> Anyway, why would anyone want to withhold the source of a derivative of
> something that already has the source available? Maybe they don't want
> the world to see how quick & dirty their hacks are... :^)

I am not really saying that this guy doesn't want to distribute his 
source.  I just don't have it myself.  The actual problem I have
with source requests in general is that they are not usually source
requests, more like demands.  Source is a funny thing.  I usually
distribute mine, but others don't.  I just wanted to reiterate to
those who forget that copyrights are not public domains.  No real
big deal.  I probably didn't need to reiterate anyway.  I must've been
in a bad mood or something stupid.

|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|Tom Hite					|  The views expressed by me |
|Manager, Product development			|  are mine, not necessarily |
|CADSI (Computer Aided Design Software Inc.	|  the views of CADSI.       |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|

kessler@hacketorium.Eng.Sun.COM (Tom Kessler) (04/25/91)

I recall seeing a description of micro emacs for windows here a while ago.
Anyone know where I can such a beast via ftp?

 

mar@mips.com (Derrick Mar) (04/25/91)

In article <KESSLER.91Apr24153341@hacketorium.Eng.Sun.COM>, kessler@hacketorium.Eng.Sun.COM (Tom Kessler) writes:
|> 
|> I recall seeing a description of micro emacs for windows here a while ago.
|> Anyone know where I can such a beast via ftp?
|> 
|>  

There is a copy of it on cica.cica.indiana.edu (129.79.20.22) under 
/pub/pc/win3/util:

	mewin.zip       MicroEmacs for Windows
	mewindoc.zip    MicroEmacs Documentation

-- 
***************************************************************************
Derrick Mar             mar@mips.com or {ames,decwrl,pyramid,prls}!mips!mar
Mips Computer Systems   (408) 524-8078
928 Arques Avenue, M/S 1-03
Sunnyvale, CA 94088-3650
***************************************************************************

cballen@hubcap.clemson.edu (charles allen) (04/26/91)

From article <KESSLER.91Apr24153341@hacketorium.Eng.Sun.COM>, by kessler@hacketorium.Eng.Sun.COM (Tom Kessler):
> 
> I recall seeing a description of micro emacs for windows here a while ago.
> Anyone know where I can such a beast via ftp?
> 
>
Please forgive  my ignorance, but what the heck are micro emacs, and what do
they do?
 
As for their location, their site is:  cica.cica.indiana.edu
                  their directory is:  /pub/pc/win3/util  
                 and their files are:  mewin.zip
                                 and:  mewindoc.zip 
 
There are probably others, since it appears to be a popular product.  
- Charles A.    

rfl@po.CWRU.Edu (Ronald F. Lamb) (04/26/91)

In a previous article, cballen@hubcap.clemson.edu (charles allen) says:

>From article <KESSLER.91Apr24153341@hacketorium.Eng.Sun.COM>, by kessler@hacketorium.Eng.Sun.COM (Tom Kessler):

>Please forgive  my ignorance, but what the heck are micro emacs, and what do
>they do?
Micro emacs is a version of emacs that runs on microcomputers.
Emacs is a text editor, specifically one made for programming, that runs on 
UNIX machines, I don't know the capabilities on DOS but on unix it allows 
the user to run programs within it.
-- 
-----rfl-----------------------------------------
Ronald F. Lamb   | Email Address:
		 | 	lamb@scl.cwru.edu
		 |	lamb@alpha.cwru.edu