ehrlich@cs.psu.edu (Daniel Ehrlich) (03/02/90)
Archive-name: ibm-rt-fixes/01-Mar-90
Original-posting-by: ehrlich@cs.psu.edu (Daniel Ehrlich)
Original-subject: Re: hc2.1y and dbx
Archive-site: bikini.cis.ufl.edu [128.227.224.1]
Archive-directory: pub/ibm-fixes
Reposted-by: emv@math.lsa.umich.edu (Edward Vielmetti)
In article <1990Feb27.225719.1443@terminator.cc.umich.edu> ric@rioja.ifs.umich.edu (Richard Campbell) writes:
Richard> At the Washington Usenix RT/AOS4.3 bof, it
Richard> was mentioned that hc2.1y was in very good shape
Richard> and that it worked well with dbx.
Richard> Now that we have hc2.1y, we're not exactly seeing
Richard> wonderfullness on the dbx front. Should we? Or do we
Richard> need to pick up a new dbx?
Which DBX are you using? The dbx that came with the Sep/Dec 88 release or
the one issued by Eric Brunner as patch V1.15 parts 1 through 5? The dbx
that came originaly was never very useful. The new version is archived on
the host bikini.cis.ufl.edu [128.227.224.1] in the directory
pub/ibm-rt-fixes.
--
Dan Ehrlich <ehrlich@cs.psu.edu>
Voice: +1 814 863 1142 FAX: +1 814 865 3176