[net.auto] Mandatory Seatbelt Laws

seifert@ihuxl.UUCP (01/30/84)

[ moved from net.followup ]

> However, in my car, I don't wear the shoulder belt. Why? Because 
> said belt cuts me across the throat when I do wear it, and it 
> would decapitate me should an accident happen.

Such is the problem when stylists and bankers try and design cars.
Cars designed by engineers don't have these problems.

		shopping for a racing harness,
-- 
		_____
	       /_____\		from the flying doghouse of
	      /_______\			Snoopy
		|___|	
	    ____|___|_____	    ihnp4!ihuxl!seifert

lat@wbux5.UUCP (01/31/84)

[yummm...this line tastes good (not THAT kind of line, silly)]

	Well, I just couldn't stay out of this one any longer.  Here's my
	$0.02 worth on this subject.

	I never used to wear seatbelts.  Sometimes I still forget to put
	them (it, whatever) on when I get into a car.  But then again, old
	habits die hard.  Fortunately, most of my friends wear seatbelts,
	and that helps to reinforce this "habit".  I learned the hard way
	about wearing (or should I say not wearing) seatbelts.  I have been
	involved in 3 major car accidents -- two when I was the driver and
	one when I wasn't.  All three times, I was not wearing a seatbelt.

	The first time, I lost control of my '73 Gremlin and ran head on into
	a tree doing about 45 miles an hour.  The whole car was totaled.  I
	flattened out the steering wheel, hit my head on the windshield, and
	then broke the back of the bucket seat from the force of impact.  I had
	stitches in the corner of my eye, and stitches on my kneecap.  I will
	always have the scars.  I was also told that I was lucky to be alive,
	considering I wasn't wearing a seatbelt.  Thank god I was by myself...
	if there was anyone in the passenger seat, and they weren't wearing a
	seatbelt, they would be dead.  Need I say more about this one?

	But I thought I was invincible (I was 18 at the time).  So, it was
	only natural for me to not wear a seatbelt.  The second accident
	was in my '73 Opel.  I hit a patch of ice (we had no idea that it
	had gotten slippery out, and it was a thin glaze, not something you
	were immediately aware of...by the time we realized it, it was too
	late).  I slid around the corner, across the road, and into the
	wooden guard posts, which, needless to say, won the fight.  They
	didn't even budge.  I still have the picture of the car.  The front
	end of the driver's side was totaled, the frame was completely out
	of shape, the passenger side window shattered.  I hit my head on the
	steering wheel, and my passenger hit her head on the dash.  But,
	once again, nobody was seriously hurt, besides my Opel.  So I really
	didn't learn my lesson.

	The third time, I wasn't driving.  I was a passenger in my friend
	Dave's Maverick.  No seatbelts.  He took a corner too fast (no flames
	please, unless you are a perfect driver, of which there are none),
	and we went over the wall and took a three foot drop.  The car landed
	on the passenger side, and did not have a straight piece of metal
	or frame left.  All four tires were flat, the front side window on
	the driver's side shattered and fell in on us, and the windshield
	shattered and, luckily, fell outside instead of inside.  Miraculously,
	the side window on my side stayed intact.  We both had to go to the
	hospital...I had done a job on my shoulder, and Dave had broken ribs.
	If we had had seatbelts on, I don't think we would've gotten as hurt
	as we did.  The injuries resulted from being thrown around the car
	as we went over the wall.

	I'm not trying to preach to anyone, and I am not trying to make this
	a bid for sympathy...all this happened a while ago.  I am just trying
	to get a little first-hand experience into this discussion, rather than
	some of the second-hand stuff I have been reading.  Granted, there is
	always that one-in-a-million chance that the seatbelt might get jammed
	and you won't be able to get it undone, but personally, I will take
	that one-in-a-million chance.  (Besides, I already did that when I
	was just knee-high to a grasshopper...I stuck the buckle into the
	latch cockeyed, and couldn't get it back out...but that's another story
	altogether).

Laurie
[ihnp4, houxf, mhuxt]!wbux5!lat

CSO \ 185 Monmouth Parkway \ West Long Branch \ NJ \ 07733 \ (203)-870-7491

tjt@kobold.UUCP (02/02/84)

Greg Woods (hao!woods) asks (in net.followup -- I'll reply here):

    How does the insurance company get to determine that the injured driver
    (in a serious accident, of course) was not wearing a seatbelt? Would
    you trust this judgment to *your* insurance company? I sure wouldn't!

One possibility: people here have previously stated that seatbelts
won't prevent *all* injuries.  In fact, if you were wearing seatbelts,
and the accident was severe enough to cause you serious injuries, I
would expect to see some characteristic injuries.  e.g. bruises and
abrasions where the seatbelt cut into your lap and chest.

I'm not sure how you would determine if you were wearing seatbelts in a
less severe accident (i.e. no injury from the seatbelt itself),
although I would also expect that most of these accidents would result
in little or no injury anyway if you were wearing your seatbelt so you
wouldn't have an insurance claim (at least, not for personal injury --
property damage to your car is another matter).

If you want a more objective test, I'm sure that something could be
built into the seatbelt mechanism itself to record peak stress.  I'm
not sure what the likelihood for fraud would be here.  Presumably it
would be too difficult and expensive to crash your car once with a
dummy inside it in order to "pre-stress" the seatbelt and then not wear
it.

I think that there is already perceptible damage to a typical
inertia/retractor seatbelt mechanism in a serious collision since I
vaguely recall some notice in some new car book that advised inspecting
or replacing the seatbelts after any serious collision.

Note: I have not been personally involved in a serious accident, with
or without a seatbelt.  If you *have*, feel free to confirm or deny any
of this.

-- 
	Tom Teixeira,  Massachusetts Computer Corporation.  Westford MA
	...!{ihnp4,harpo,decvax}!masscomp!tjt   (617) 692-6200 x275

srm@pyuxnn.UUCP (SR Marcovici) (02/02/84)

Here's MY personal seatbelt story - I'll try to keep it brief:

	I've always worn seatbelts (shoulder harnesses, or whatever)
and besides the fact that I feel uncomfortable WITHOUT them on, I'm
convinced that they do save lives; I believe they saved mine and my
wife's.
	We were  stopped behind a large american station wagon who was
waiting to make a left turn. This was on a 2 lane highway, just a
shoulder on each side to pass - in any case I was simply waiting
behind this car until he made his turn, so I could proceed straight
ahead. With no warning a Cadillac smashed into the rear of my Toyota
Corona and propelled us forward at a fairly quick speed - we were
forced back into the seats so hard that the seat backs reclined fully.
I managed to regain a semi-upright position in time to see us careen
off the wagon in front of us. We then veered into the lane of oncoming
traffic - luckily no one was coming our way - and continued another 50
feet or so until the car came to a stop. 
	My injuries were limited to some bad bruises caused by the
seat belt, and some cuts on my knees (I've got long legs). My wife was
bruised on the face by the shoulder harness, and that's it. It was
obvious that without the belts on we would certainly have sustained
serious injuries, if not worse. My car was totalled; the driver of
the Caddy was cited for reckless driving and was never fined/sentenced
since she was a resident of NY and this occurred in NJ (she simply
didn't show for the court date).
	Of course I'm glad to have survived, but I do feel anger at
having saved this woman alot of grief because we chose to protect
ourselves - due to the circumstances, she got off scott free.

	BUCKLE UP!
				Steve Marcovici
				AT&T BELL LABS
				..pyuxnn!srm

warren@ihnss.UUCP (Warren Montgomery) (02/06/84)

Here is a not entirely serious suggestion for using of all of that
expensive airbag technology.  If it works, you could just have some
sort of dye capsule in the dash spray a harmless but difficult to
remove dye at driver and passenger under crash conditions. 
Non-bucklers would be branded by the presense of dye where their
belts should have been and the lack of dye on their belts.

Isn't technology marvelous?

-- 

	Warren Montgomery
	ihnss!warren
	IH x2494

burt@axiom.UUCP (Burt Janz) (02/07/84)

I, too, had a bad crackup way back in '72 while on the way to Fairly
Ridiculous U. in Hackensack.  I ran off the road and the car not only
spun around but flipped over and landed on the driver's side.  My
seatbelts were on.  If the hadn't been, I probably wouldn't have been
able to type this response.

And, to those worried about getting their belts off, CARRY A F***ING KNIFE!!

I have a knife attached to the front of my seat (driver's side).  It's in
a small canvas bag with one of those nautical boat-type snaps on it.  The
bag is sown to the seat.  If I crack up (which I hope NEVER to to again)
and can't get the belt off, there's a knife available....

The knife is one of those cheap locking kind you get for 2.99 out of a
magazine or a cheap tool sale at a motel....

				Burt Janz

srm@nsc.UUCP (Richard Mateosian) (04/08/85)

In article <393@nmtvax.UUCP> robert@nmtvax.UUCP writes:
>
>What do you think of mandatory seatbelt laws?

It's about time.

>My '61 Bug didn't even have seatbelts.  How could I comply?

Neither did my '56 Ford or my '58 Pontiac, so I *paid money* to have
them installed.  I've used seat belts *every* time I've driven for at
least the last 25 years, and I always use them as a rider when at all
possible.

I honestly don't understand the fuss people make about wearing them, and
I was shocked to hear how low a percentage of people wear them. 
-- 
Richard Mateosian
{allegra,cbosgd,decwrl,hplabs,ihnp4,seismo}!nsc!srm    nsc!srm@decwrl.ARPA

carnes@gargoyle.UChicago.UUCP (Richard Carnes) (04/13/85)

>>1.  Unbelted drivers are far more apt to lose control of their
>>vehicles than belted drivers, thus endangering others.
>
>Let's see some statistics for this one.  

This claim is frequently made by experts in traffic safety.  I do not
know if studies have been done specifically to assess the magnitude
of this effect in preventing serious and fatal injuries.  However,
the Transportation Research Institute of the University of Michigan
and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration have performed
or sponsored numerous studies of motor vehicle safety, and the
researchers in these organizations would be able to give a better
answer to this question than I can.  Another source is Elaine
Petrucelli of the American Association of Automotive Medicine.  Her
phone number (published in some literature I have) is 312-640-8440.
If someone less lazy than I am would like to contact these
organizations to obtain further information and report back to the
net, I would be grateful.  

However, even without hard numbers, common sense would indicate that
a driver who is alive, uninjured, and seated in front of the steering
wheel can maintain better control of his car after it has been struck
than a driver who is dead, unconscious, on the right side of the car,
or plunging through the windshield.  Serious injuries and fatalities
can occur at speeds of as low as 12 mph.  It is easy to imagine
accidents in intersections or on freeways, for example, in which an
unbelted driver would lose control of his vehicle and hit a
pedestrian or another car, particularly if the driver is not very
resilient physically, as in the case of many elderly people.  (Lord
knows there are enough drivers on the road who need all the help they
can get just to stay between the white lines.)

At any given moment, only about 1 out of 7 American motorists has
his/her belt fastened, a remarkable statistic in light of the wide
publicity given to the effectiveness of seat belts.  I would be very
interested to know, from those reading this who do not ordinarily use
their belts, how you account for the fact that you do not.  Is it
simply a matter of habit?  Do you believe that belts increase your
risk?  Do you believe the protection is not worth the trouble, like
wearing a helmet to protect yourself from meteorites?  Do you simply
forget?  Do you support mandatory belt-use laws?  You can mail me a
response if you prefer.

Finally, someone suggested that cops would feel embarrassed about
writing out tickets for non-use of belts.  Let me suggest that you
ask a cop or state patrolman whether he prefers writing the tickets
or scraping someone off the pavement and then telling the nearest
relatives that the victim is now dead or a vegetable.

Richard Carnes, ihnp4!gargoyle!carnes

kenyon@nmtvax.UUCP (05/06/85)

If you believe that insurance companies are gong to share much of the
savings with drivers, you are crazy.  If I were an insurance company 
I would push this thing to the hilt and spend all the money I could
find to get this control passed.  Then I could complain to the govern-
ment for two years complaining that I was broke and I needed to make up
for all the money I spent trying to get it passed.  In other words, the
driver gets screwed like always!  We, the under 24 year-old-unmarried males
are already bent over by the insurance companies.  I thought about getting
married just to decrease my premiums.  I could have saved thousands by now! 
(O.K. hundreds.)

I'm sure insurance companies pushed the minimum coverage and mandatory
coverage and they haven't even paid for that fight yet...


Robert Kenyon
...ucbvax!unmvax!nmtvax!kenyon

---------------------------------------------------------------------------