[comp.archives] [astro] Re: Anyone know where the yale star catalogue may be FTP'd from ?

sterner@warper.jhuapl.edu (Ray Sterner) (03/17/91)

Archive-name: astro/catalog/yale-bright-star/1991-03-15
Archive-directory: mandarin.mit.edu:/astro/data.etc/yale.bright/ [18.82.0.21]
Original-posting-by: sterner@warper.jhuapl.edu (Ray Sterner)
Original-subject: Re: Anyone know where the yale star catalogue may be FTP'd from ?
Reposted-by: emv@msen.com (Edward Vielmetti, MSEN)

loren@tristan.llnl.gov (Loren Petrich) writes:
>       On the subject of the Yale Bright Star Catalog, does anyone
>       know how complete it is advertised as?
>       The measure I would be interested in is a magnitude upper limit.
>       Is it complete to only magnitude 5.0, or 6.0, or 7.0?
>       And if there are several editions of it, what is the most
>       complete one, and where may it be found?
>Loren Petrich, the Master Blaster: loren@sunlight.llnl.gov

   Here is a histogram of the visual magnitudes in the YBS (4th ed):
     
     Magnitude       Number
       Range        of stars
   -2.00  -1.50        0
   -1.50  -1.00        1      Brightest star = -1.46 = Sirius
   -1.00  -0.50        1
   -0.50   0.00        3     
    0.00   0.50        5       
    0.50   1.00        5
    1.00   1.50        7
    1.50   2.00       29
    2.00   2.50       43
    2.50   3.00       87
    3.00   3.50      116
    3.50   4.00      243
    4.00   4.50      397
    4.50   5.00      754
    5.00   5.50     1299
    5.50   6.00     2254
    6.00   6.50     3286
    6.50   7.00      524
    7.00   7.50       36
    7.50   8.00        6      Faintest star = 7.96
    8.00   8.50        0

    The YBS is obviously not complete to its faintest magnitude.
    It is certainly complete to some limit (0 -1.4 for instance)
    but that limit may not be very faint, I don't know what it is.
    It also contains 14 non-stellar objects which have their
    magnitudes set to exactly 0.0, none of the stars in the catalog
    have a magnitude of exactly 0, so this is an easy way to find the
    non-stellar objects (they have been removed from the above histogram).

    The YBS is a catalog of 9110 objects (9096 stars).  It will never be
    complete to its faintest magnitude, but it includes many other
    values that are updated occasionally.

  Ray Sterner                     sterner%str.decnet@warper.jhuapl.edu 
  Johns Hopkins University        North latitude 39.16 degrees.
  Applied Physics Laboratory      West longitude 76.90 degrees.
  Laurel, MD 20723-6099

stefano@harpo.phyast.pitt.edu (Stefano Casertano) (03/17/91)

Archive-name: astro/catalog/yale-bright-star/1991-03-15
Archive-directory: mandarin.mit.edu:/astro/data.etc/yale.bright/ [18.82.0.21]
Original-posting-by: stefano@harpo.phyast.pitt.edu (Stefano Casertano)
Original-subject: Re: Anyone know where the yale star catalogue may be FTP'd from ?
Reposted-by: emv@msen.com (Edward Vielmetti, MSEN)

In article <93191@lll-winken.LLNL.GOV> loren@tristan.llnl.gov (Loren Petrich) writes:
>
>	On the subject of the Yale Bright Star Catalog, does anyone
>know how complete it is advertised as?
>
>	The measure I would be interested in is a magnitude upper
>limit.
>
>	Is it complete to only magnitude 5.0, or 6.0, or 7.0?
>
>	And if there are several editions of it, what is the most
>complete one, and where may it be found?
>

The Yale Bright Star Catalog, Fourth Edition (1982), is probably
statistically complete to a visual apparent magnitude (V) of 6.0.  The
Supplement published in 1983 was supposed to bring the completeness
limit to 6.5; in fact, the Catalog+Supplement is probably about only 80%
complete between V=6.4 and 6.5, based on the number of stars.  The
Catalog+Supplement is probably statistically complete for V < 6.3. 

For your reference, the Supplement added only 5 stars with V < 6.0 to the
5085 listed in the Catalog, so it makes little difference whether 
or not the Supplement is used as long as you keep to V < 6.0.

Note that completeness and magnitude limits depend rather sensitively on
color.  Part of the reason for the missed stars is that the original
selection was based on photographic magnitudes, which correspond to
somewhat bluer light and discriminate against very red stars. 

Reference: Bahcall, Casertano and Ratnatunga, Astrophysical Journal
Vol. 320, pp. 515-526, September 1987.

                                           Stefano Casertano
                                           stefano@bondi.phyast.pitt.edu