wisner@hayes.fai.alaska.edu (Bill Wisner) (01/19/90)
In article <630@unet.UUCP> noemi@unet.unet.com (Noemi Berry) writes: > YOOOOOO! > THIS IS A MAJOR FLAME!!!! Good start. Get our hopes up. > LOOK AT YOUR NEWSGROUPS BEFORE POSTING **** PLEASE ****!!!! ..but then you lose it. Any USENET reader with the mind of a parsnip will check the newsgroups without requiring prompting from you. >It's unaware netnews readers like this who drag down the net. I'm sorry, but you're mistaken. It's mindless sniveling toads who can't outflame a three-year-old who drag down the net. >PLEASE take this ridiculous discussion out of rec.arts.tv.soaps! What, to make more room for all the other ridiculous discussions in rec.arts.tv.soaps? >And while you're at it, clean up your act. This childish garbage doesn't >promote your case at all. Gee, don't you think you were a bit hard on the Beav? w.
guthrie@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (Steve and Beth) (01/19/90)
Since reacting to these posts only seems to propagate them, I suggest this be the last post. Obviously the newsgroups line was in error, so readers of rec.arts.tv.soaps asked you edit the newsgroups line. Not a hefty request, actually quite reasonable. And the reaction to the profane diatribe was well put and well deserved. It seems on the NET, that men with NO social lives, and obviously psychological problems, and some women too, particpate in nonsensical flaming. They make up for their lack of a LIFE by invading others. We are not interested, and never will be. Your audience awaits you in alt.flame, now PLEASE stay out of rec.arts.tv.soaps before someone has to write your sysadmin who will direct you to read newusers. Thanks. Beth
wisner@hayes.fai.alaska.edu (Bill Wisner) (01/19/90)
guthrie@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (Steve and Beth) writes: >It seems on the NET, that men with NO social lives, and obviously >psychological problems, and some women too, particpate in >nonsensical flaming. They make up for their lack of a LIFE >by invading others. We are not interested, and never will >be. Now this is a bit better. Still too damned polite, but better. With a little work you may actually become a worthwhile human being. But first lose the "Steve and Beth" bit. It sounds like something from a soap opera. >Your audience awaits you in alt.flame, now PLEASE stay out of >rec.arts.tv.soaps before someone has to write your sysadmin >who will direct you to read newusers. Thanks. Oh, please do. w.
PJB900@PSUVM.BITNET (BIFF) (01/19/90)
In article <33367@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu>, guthrie@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (Steve and Beth) says: > >Since reacting to these posts only seems to propagate them, I suggest >this be the last post. HI STEVE AND BETH! THIS IS BIFF! SORRY IF WE MESSED UP BUT WERE NEW TO THIS BBOARD. >Obviously the newsgroups line was in error, so readers of >rec.arts.tv.soaps asked you edit the newsgroups line. Not a hefty >request, actually quite reasonable. And the reaction to the >profane diatribe was well put and well deserved. CAN YOU TELL ME HOW TO EDIT THE NEWSGROUPS LINE? LIKE I SAID I'M NEW TO THIS BBOARD AND HAVEN'T FIGURED OUT ALL THE DETAILS YET. >It seems on the NET, that men with NO social lives, and obviously >psychological problems, and some women too, particpate in >nonsensical flaming. They make up for their lack of a LIFE >by invading others. We are not interested, and never will >be. >Your audience awaits you in alt.flame, now PLEASE stay out of >rec.arts.tv.soaps before someone has to write your sysadmin >who will direct you to read newusers. Thanks. WHAT IS A SYSADMIN? I HAVE A FRIEND WHO WORKS AT THE MICRO LAB. MAYBE HE CAN TELL ME HUH? DO YOU READ ALT.SEX TOO? WELL SEE YOU LATER. BYE!! >Beth BIFF BIFF AT PSUVMA.BIT.NET
rissa@attctc.Dallas.TX.US (Patricia O Tuama) (01/19/90)
In article <33367@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu> guthrie@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (Steve and Beth) writes: >Obviously the newsgroups line was in error, so readers of >rec.arts.tv.soaps asked you edit the newsgroups line. Beth, you can't ask other netters to do something you aren't will- ing to do yourself. You xposted your message to all four groups including r.a.tv.soaps. You would have been much better off post- ing to alt.flame only. >It seems on the NET, that men with NO social lives, and obviously >psychological problems, and some women too, particpate in >nonsensical flaming. They make up for their lack of a LIFE >by invading others. We are not interested, and never will >be. Oh, Beth, don't be so coy. We've all seen dozens of postings from you in alt.flame in the last year. Perhaps you'd care to expound on your own psychological problems for us? Or tell us about your lack of a LIFE that you're making up for now by invading others? >rec.arts.tv.soaps before someone has to write your sysadmin >who will direct you to read newusers. Thanks. Oohhh, what a nasty vindictive thing to say. If you should happen to write to anyone's sysadmin about this, dear, do make sure you point out that you are just as guilty as the person about whom you are complaining.
maffray@csri.toronto.edu (Frederic Maffray) (01/20/90)
In article <33367@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu> guthrie@silver.ucs.indiana.edu (Steve and Beth) writes: > >Obviously the newsgroups line was in error, Which error was that? Let's see: --> Newsgroups: soc.women,soc.singles,rec.arts.tv.soaps,alt.flame "Arts," soaps? Obviously. --- Frederic Maffray, Toronto, Ontario.