crm@romeo.cs.duke.edu (Charlie Martin) (12/15/89)
Is anyone aware of a port of Mach to 386 architectures? I plan on buying a 386-based PC in the near future, and would like to have a real operating system for it. Thx, Charlie Martin (crm@cs.duke.edu,mcnc!duke!crm)
af@spice.cs.cmu.edu (Alessandro Forin) (12/21/89)
In article <16489@duke.cs.duke.edu>, crm@romeo.cs.duke.edu (Charlie Martin) writes: > > Is anyone aware of a port of Mach to 386 architectures? I plan on > buying a 386-based PC in the near future, and would like to have a > real operating system for it. > > Thx, > > Charlie Martin (crm@cs.duke.edu,mcnc!duke!crm) Go ahead with your shopping. The port was done jointly by an Intel/Olivetti/Prime consortium, with lots of help from our side. I am not going to tell you how to get it though, someone could kill me if I did :-)). But rest assured you'll see it around pretty soon. sandro-
fdr@masscomp.ccur.com (Franklin Reynolds) (01/04/90)
I have heard rumors that the Prime/Intel/others Mach effort
has been abandoned. Does anyone know whether this is true?
If true, are there any other prospects for a port of Mach
to the 386 ?
Franklin Reynolds
fdr@westford.ccur.com
{uunet,harvard,mit-eddie,ulowell}!masscomp!fdrjoel@nosun.UUCP (Joel Clark) (01/05/90)
In article <6437@masscomp.ccur.com> fdr@joy.UUCP (Franklin Reynolds) writes: >I have heard rumors that the Prime/Intel/others Mach effort >has been abandoned. Does anyone know whether this is true? >If true, are there any other prospects for a port of Mach >to the 386 ? > > Franklin Reynolds > fdr@westford.ccur.com > {uunet,harvard,mit-eddie,ulowell}!masscomp!fdr This is not true, but I am not the one working on it. Joel Clark Intel Scientific Computers