[net.auto] Negative Camber on Triumphs Explained

ix826@sdcc6.UUCP (tim drabik) (07/25/85)

	Triumphs which exhibit a large amount of negative camber have
swing-axle rear suspension.  The plane of the wheel is constrained to
be perpendicular to the drive shaft, which is universal-jointed on one end
only, at the differential.  This suspension geometry yields an unusually
high roll center, which has many interesting side-effects.  In
particular,  when cornering, the effects of body roll are to increase
the camber of the outside rear wheel.  If there were no negative static
camber, the camber at full roll would be positive.  With an adequate
amount of negative static camber, the outside wheel becomes upright when
cornering, for maximum tire contact area.  
	The reason camber on these cars often looks preposterously large
is that the leaf springs Triumph built were congenitally weak, and lose
their temper after about 10000 to 15000 miles.  It is most common to see
the driver's side wheel with a greater amount of negative camber, since
the car is driven one-up more often than with a passenger.
	Triumph owners tired of replacing U-joints (side effect of
negative camber) can have their rear spring rebuilt by a good spring
shop, and kiss the problem goodbye.

					A happy Spitfire owner,
					Tim Drabik
					...sdcc6!ix826