[comp.os.mach] Mach, Minix, OS/9 - are they any good?

thomas@duteca (Thomas Okken) (11/20/90)

I want to get unix on my Mac. If there were only A/UX, I'd have an easy time
choosing the way to do it, but I've heard of a number of alternatives:
Minix, Mach, OS/9. Are any of these systems any good? Specifically, do you
get a true multiuser, multitasking, virtual memory system with all the goodies
(mainly programming tools: cc, make, lex, yacc, etc.)?
Can true unix software be ported to these systems? In short, do any or all
of these systems constitute a true replacement for the real thing (A/UX)?

If anyone has something to say about this, I would like to hear from you.
I'm especially interested in your bad experiences: systems that are very
hard to get up and running, use huge amounts of disk space, problems getting
public domain software to compile, etc.

Please answer only by e-mail; I will post a summary to comp.sys.mac.misc.

To everyone who spends any fraction of their time answering questions like
these: thank you, thank you, thank you. I really appreciate it! :-) :-)

Thomas Okken (thomas@duteca.tudelft.nl)