radvan (Don Radvan) (11/20/90)
Does anyone know if there exists support for the port-style IPC of Mach in other OSs, particularly BSD variants and the such? I would like to communicate with several processes remotely from a Mach machine and be unconcerned about the server OS, as long as it supports port-based IPC. (And vice-versa) Am I limited to Mach? Any experience with this? Your experience is much appreciated, Don Radvan MDI/Motorola. // Disclaimer = TRUE //
Richard.Draves@CS.CMU.EDU (11/20/90)
> Excerpts from netnews.comp.os.mach: 19-Nov-90 Ports on Other OS? > mdivax1!radvan (448) > Does anyone know if there exists support for the port-style IPC of > Mach in other OSs, particularly BSD variants and the such? > I would like to communicate with several processes remotely from a > Mach machine and be unconcerned about the server OS, as long as it > supports port-based IPC. (And vice-versa) It is possible to support Mach IPC on other operating systems, with degraded performance and security. For example, a shared library can take the place of the Mach kernel. The ports and other IPC data structures reside in shared data. A netmsgserver process uses the shared library and also talks to other netmsgservers elsewhere in the network. Rich