wald-david@CS.YALE.EDU (david wald) (11/04/88)
In article <8810291732.AA27129@ghidrah.eecg.toronto.edu> okrieg@eecg.toronto.edu ("Orran Y. Krieger") writes: >I believe that the current version of MACH on Next does not support >multiple processors. However even when it will, each NEXT CPU board has >its own local memory etc... Does anyone know if when multiple processor >boards can be put in will they have a global physical address space >(i.e. processor A can address processor B`s memory). Hmmm no cache so >I guess that there would be no consistency problem... Unless you're talking about a 680x0, x >= 2. The in-chip cache could get just as screwed up in a multi-processor - common-memory situation. ============================================================================ David Wald wald-david@yale.UUCP waldave@yalevm.bitnet ============================================================================