brett@rtech.rtech.com (Brett Taylor) (04/12/89)
Anyone out there planning on porting X to the nExt machine? Seems like you could approach it several ways. The first being to take over the display like the current X model. The second and more desirable method would be, have an X server translate X requests into nExt step calls. This would allow concurrent nExt apps and X apps. Thanks in advance for any information.
jec@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu (James E. Conley) (04/12/89)
According to the latest InfoWorld, NeXT has been talking to MIT (okay, the X Consortium) about porting X to the NeXT. X applications would run under the NeXT Step environment if I read it correctly. The article pointed out that at this point they are talking it over and trying to figure out who should do what. No code work has been done as far as InfoWorld knew. James Conley Indiana University Computer Science jec@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu
jdn@mas.UUCP (Jeff Nisewanger) (04/13/89)
In article <2777@rtech.rtech.com> brett@rtech.rtech.com (Brett Taylor) writes: >Anyone out there planning on porting X to the nExt machine? Seems like >you could approach it several ways. The first being to take over the >display like the current X model. The second and more desirable method >would be, have an X server translate X requests into nExt step calls. >This would allow concurrent nExt apps and X apps. > Except that Display PostScript doesn't support traditional rasterop functions and X11 is centered around using rasterops for any kind of special effects like rubber-banding etc. etc. Jeff Nisewanger Measurex Automation Systems ....apple!mas1!jdn
hoyt@polyslo.CalPoly.EDU (Sir Hoyt) (04/14/89)
In article <1781@mas1.mas.UUCP> jdn@mas1.UUCP (Jeff Nisewanger) writes: > Except that Display PostScript doesn't support traditional >rasterop functions and X11 is centered around using rasterops for >any kind of special effects like rubber-banding etc. etc. True, the current implementations of X servers use 'traditional rasterops' to render an image on the screen. But from what I know about X, there is nothing that says you have to render the images this way ( am I wrong ?? ). An xclient ask the X server to draw a line from point A to point B. How the X server 'draws' the line on the screen is of no concern to the xclient. -- John H. Pochmara A career is great, UUCP: {csun,voder,trwind}!polyslo!hoyt But you can't run your Internet: hoyt@polyslo.CalPoly.EDU fingers through its hair -Graffiti 4/13/83
ktly@vax5.CIT.CORNELL.EDU (04/14/89)
In article <19516@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu> jec@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu (James E. Conley) writes: > According to the latest InfoWorld, NeXT has been talking to MIT (okay, >the X Consortium) about porting X to the NeXT. X applications would run under >the NeXT Step environment if I read it correctly. The article pointed out that >at this point they are talking it over and trying to figure out who should do >what. No code work has been done as far as InfoWorld knew. >James Conley >Indiana University Computer Science >jec@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu When I spoke with Jobs during his visit to Cornell in February, he said that NeXT wouldn't offer a version of X because, "there isn't a signif- icant body of software that runs under X-Windows." He did mention that MIT may be doing a version, though. -Jonathan P.S. Does anybody remember Jobs ridiculing mice with more than one button soon after the Mac came out?