[comp.sys.next] New OD prices

sfrank@orion.oac.uci.edu (Steven Frank) (09/28/90)

The educational price for an Optical Disk is $149.  This is the same
as the list price, apparently.  This looks like a bad sign for
OD users (me).  Are there any 3rd party distribution channels 
that would be cheaper?  

mcguire@cs.tamu.edu (Tim McGuire) (09/28/90)

sfrank@orion.oac.uci.edu (Steven Frank) writes:
>The educational price for an Optical Disk is $149.  This is the same
>as the list price, apparently.  This looks like a bad sign for
>OD users (me).  Are there any 3rd party distribution channels 
>that would be cheaper?  

I really doubt that you're going to find the optical disks much cheaper
than that for a while.  The nice folks from NeXT didn't say this exactly,
but I gathered that Canon hasn't been developing further markets for the 
OD that would increase the production and lower the price.  I further suspect
that this is the major (and perhaps the only) reason you aren't seeing some 
sort of optical technology on the new cubes/slabs.

Tim McGuire
mcguire@cs.tamu.edu

asd@mace.cc.purdue.edu (Kareth) (09/29/90)

In <8619@helios.TAMU.EDU> mcguire@cs.tamu.edu (Tim McGuire) writes:

>I really doubt that you're going to find the optical disks much cheaper
>than that for a while.  The nice folks from NeXT didn't say this exactly,
>but I gathered that Canon hasn't been developing further markets for the 
>OD that would increase the production and lower the price.  I further suspect
>that this is the major (and perhaps the only) reason you aren't seeing some 
>sort of optical technology on the new cubes/slabs.

Actually, from talking to one of the reps, NeXT decided to go for
working on speed, and having fast harddrives.  The OD will still be
supported and sold, but they are going to let it go more of the way of
third party, and let them handle it.  For instance, Iomega has a new
drive called Lasersafe that is 610MB MO, and is a SCSI device.  So if
you want OD power, ya can look at that.  It's pricier than the Canon,
but it's also faster (from what I understand) and at 610MB, a tad bit
better storage size, no?  It's also uses the ISO standard (whatever
one that is).  The NeXT guy also said that Sony was doing the best
with OD technology, but that wasn't on the market, or something (I
forget, maybe it was too pricey).  Anyways, I'd personally wait for a
standard to emerge, then you'll be able to move HUGE quantities of
data from machine to machine.  Of course, waiting for a standard might
be equivalent to waiting for a snow ball fight in hell.

roy@prism.gatech.EDU (Roy Mongiovi) (09/29/90)

It isn't a question of waiting for an OD standard or obtaining a faster
optical drive.  I already own one of the original NeXT machines.  When I
bought the machine OD's were $50 and they said that the price would go
down as they started producing them in larger volume.

Now they've TRIPLED the price of blanks disks.  Should I not feel shafted?
-- 
Roy J. Mongiovi     Systems Support Specialist     Office of Computing Services
Georgia Institute of Technology	  Atlanta, Georgia  30332-0275   (404) 894-4660
	uucp: ...!{allegra,amd,hplabs,ut-ngp}!gatech!prism!roy
	ARPA: roy@prism.gatech.edu

asd@mace.cc.purdue.edu (Kareth) (09/29/90)

In <14253@hydra.gatech.EDU> roy@prism.gatech.EDU (Roy Mongiovi) writes:

>It isn't a question of waiting for an OD standard or obtaining a faster
>optical drive.  I already own one of the original NeXT machines.  When I
>bought the machine OD's were $50 and they said that the price would go
>down as they started producing them in larger volume.

>Now they've TRIPLED the price of blanks disks.  Should I not feel shafted?

That's retail.  Do you know what educational discounts will be?
Probably not that much better, but it won't be as bad.  Most likely
Canon discovered that they weren't selling as many OD's as they
thought (or NeXT promised) they would.  If I was gonna get pissed at
anybody, I'd get pissed at Canon for not getting the price down, and
for them not getting a larger, faster drive out on the market, and
market it to NeXT well.

-k

phd_ivo@gsbacd.uchicago.edu (09/29/90)

In article <5646@mace.cc.purdue.edu>, asd@mace.cc.purdue.edu (Kareth) writes...
 
+If I was gonna get pissed at
+anybody, I'd get pissed at Canon for not getting the price down, and
+for them not getting a larger, faster drive out on the market, and
+market it to NeXT well.

..and for not making their drives sufficiently dust-tolerant. I have lost
enough data from ODs that I am thinking twice about ever using it again...

/ivo welch	ivo@next.agsm.ucla.edu