aire@alessia.dei.unipd.it (Renzo Marcanzin) (10/25/90)
Hi guys, it's a lot of time that I read the new about the Next and the Mac, I think that look like silly begin a war between Macusers and Nextusers. The ones of you that think that Next is better, do that because they have good reasons, bye the other sidy the ones that think that Mac is better, have their reasons. IS VERY SILLY to say that MAC IS BETTER, or NEXT IS BETTER. Like all in the world some things are good for some applications, and some others things are good for another type of applications. Is like to say PROST is better that SENNA or HONDA is better than FERRARI. The only thing of I am sure is that this sentences are only silly, and I am very surprised that so intelligent people full this space of news with silly news. Renzo Marcanzin aire@alessia.dei.unipd.it P.S. I have not a Mac or a NeXT.
cnh5730@calvin.tamu.edu (Chuck Herrick) (10/25/90)
In article <6947@alessia.dei.unipd.it> aire@alessia.dei.unipd.it (Renzo Marcanzin) writes: > IS VERY SILLY to say that MAC IS BETTER, or NEXT IS BETTER. >P.S. I have not a Mac or a NeXT. No, it's not silly. If you had a NeXT and had ever used a mac, you would know that NeXT IS better than a crapple mac. -- " ...and just who was Ken Thompson, anyway? Do you remember?"
mussat@irisa.fr (Louis Mussat) (10/26/90)
From article <6947@alessia.dei.unipd.it>, by aire@alessia.dei.unipd.it (Renzo Marcanzin): > > Is like to say PROST is better that SENNA or HONDA is better than > FERRARI. I was under the impression that you and me could agree on `` Prost PLUS Ferrari > any other team '' 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) > Renzo Marcanzin aire@alessia.dei.unipd.it / _ . / / (_) (_/ / | `-------------/-- / Louis Mussat mussat@irisa.fr