[comp.sys.next] SCSI-1 vs. SCSI-2

cyliax@ecn.purdue.edu (Ingo Cyliax) (11/28/90)

Actually, SCSI-1 devices should continue to function on a SCSI-2 bus. It's
just if you share a SCSI-2 bus with SCSI-1 and SCSI-2 devices, you may 
notice some performance loss. SCSI-1 is more or less a subset of SCSI-2.
The ideas of synchronous transfers and disconnects as well as Wide-SCSI
were around for a while, before SCSI-2 was even done.

So what you really want to look for is a drive that will do synchronous
transfers to be used with the NeXTStation for maximum performance. Note
that even though the SCSI transfer rates can be very high, the transfer
rate from the platter to the cache memory in the drive may not really be
all that high. Besides, the setup time for a transfer, the interrupt latency
and the seek times are orders of magnitude greater than the transfer times
at transfer rates of 4Mb/s, and that's where you loose alot of time when
doing random I/O as in a fileystem.

-ingo
--
/*                Ingo Cyliax    ECN, Electrical Engineering Bldg.          *
 *      cyliax@ecn.purdue.edu    Purdue University, W. Lafayette,IN 47907   *
 *          ing@cc.purdue.edu    Work: (317) 494-9523                       *
 *         cyliax@pur-ee.UUCP    Home: (317) 474-0031                       */