dastrout@miavx1.acs.muohio.edu (root@next1) (11/30/90)
Regarding my comments about X11R4 on the NeXT: 1. Yes I have it. 2. What I have has some bugs. 3. I did not write it. 4. I cannot give it out. 5. I expect the people at McGill will announce it when they are done. 6. X on a NeXT is like t*ts on a boar -- not real useful. What makes us special (better) is NeXTStep. Anyone can run X, but only a NeXT (or RS-6000) can run NeXTStep. My personal feeling is, X is a neat toy, but if you but a NeXT, run NeXTStep. I know not everyone will agree, & I don't mean to start a religious war, but I don't want my comment that one CAN run X to be taken as though one SHOULD. -- Dave Strout NeXT Campus Consultant -- Miami University. -> The above ideas are mine only, unless you like them. Then they represent whomever. <- dastrout@next3.acs.muohio.edu <- Please Reply to!!! dastrout%miavx1.bitnet@pucc.princeton.edu root@next1.acs.muohio.edu 513-523-8245
gilgalad@caen.engin.umich.edu (Ralph Seguin) (11/30/90)
In article <3012.27559c12@miavx1.acs.muohio.edu> dastrout@miavx1.acs.muohio.edu (root@next1) writes: >5. I expect the people at McGill will announce it when they are done. Any predictions as to release date? >6. X on a NeXT is like t*ts on a boar -- not real useful. What makes us Very interesting analogy there 8-) I have to disagree with you here. X is VERY nice in a network of machines. I don't have my NeXT yet, so I don't know, but I don't think that NeXTStep supports a lot of the things that X does. I agree that NeXTStep is more asthetically pleasing, but, I'd like to be able to run X too. >-- >Dave Strout >NeXT Campus Consultant -- Miami University. >-> The above ideas are mine only, unless you like them. Then they represent >whomever. <- Ralph Seguin gilgalad@dip.eecs.umich.edu 536 South Forest Apt. #915 gilgalad@caen.engin.umich.edu Ann Arbor, MI 48104 (313) 662-4805