songer@orchestra.ecn.purdue.edu (Christopher M Songer) (12/19/90)
Hi,
I heard RCS under 1.0 was buggy. (Only 8 character file names?)
Can anyone speak to rcs under 2.0? Is it now usable?
Thanks,
Chrisdeclan@remus.rutgers.edu (Declan McCullagh/LZ) (12/19/90)
In article <1990Dec18.160421.13026@noose.ecn.purdue.edu>, songer@orchestra.ecn.purdue.edu (Christopher M Songer) writes: > Hi, > I heard RCS under 1.0 was buggy. (Only 8 character file names?) > Can anyone speak to rcs under 2.0? Is it now usable? RCS (Revision Control System) version 4 is included with 2.0. Version 4 RCS can read version 3.x files but it writes files which version 3 can't read. More 2.0 tidbits: * Version 4.8 of BIND is included * Sun's PC-NFS daemon is included * Version 4.1.1.1 of the tn3270 emulation program is included * The latest login/ftpd/telnetd/telnet/ftp programs are included * cpio is included * shar is included And the single best feature in NeXTstep 2.0? You can press 'o' to open a file in Edit when viewing it in 'more'... Declan McCullagh Independent NeXT Developer
jacob@gore.com (Jacob Gore) (12/23/90)
/ comp.sys.next / declan@remus.rutgers.edu (Declan McCullagh/LZ) / Dec 18'90 / > And the single best feature in NeXTstep 2.0? You can press 'o' to > open a file in Edit when viewing it in 'more'... I guess some people are still waiting for 'more' to get all the features of 'less'... Jacob -- Jacob Gore Jacob@Gore.Com boulder!gore!jacob
jacob@gore.com (Jacob Gore) (12/23/90)
Coincidentally, here's a third opinion:
/ comp.unix.internals / bzs@world.std.com (Barry Shein) / Dec 22, 1990 /
> I consider "view" to be "less" done right.
Jacob
--
Jacob Gore Jacob@Gore.Com boulder!gore!jacob