cjp@SSESCO.com (Chuck Purcell) (01/21/91)
In-Reply-To: aburto@marlin.NOSC.MIL's message of 18 Jan 91 22:12:20 GMT In article <1693@marlin.NOSC.MIL> aburto@marlin.NOSC.MIL (Alfred A. Aburto) writes: Could you please run the following program on the 040. It is a very simple program but numerous folks over in 'comp.benchmarks' have run it on their systems and it would be interesting to see where the NEXT 040 fits......... --Results as measured and posted, so far: Using gcc-1.39 -O on the 20Mhz SUN 3/80 Chasun > time dbl-b r = 16.695311 RunTime = 122.416667 122.440u 0.100s 2:03.02 99.5% 0+10k 0+0io 0pf+0w Using cc -O on the 20Mhz SUN 3/80( and setting i=1000000 so as to finish!) Chasun > time dbl-s r = 16.695311 RunTime = 176.566667 (doing only one-tenth the work) 8-( Using cc -O on the SUN Sparc1 4/60 Salsa > time dbl-b r = 16.695311 RunTime = 50.266667 50.290u 0.040s 0:50.40 99.8% 0+132k 0+0io 0pf+0w Using the NeXT 68040(25 Mhz 68040) ----test 1-----Michael D Mellinger handel> cc -O bench.c handel> time a.out r = 16.695311 RunTime = 26.133333 26.137u 0.171s 0:26.78 98% 0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w ----test 2----Steven M. Boker---- datran2% cc bench1.c <note the difference without -O(cjp)> datran2% a.out r = 16.695311 RunTime = 29.116667 Using cc -O on the IBMrisc6000-320 Ribs > time dbl-b r = 16.695311 RunTime = 11.690000 11.69u 0.1s 0:11 99% 2+23k 0+0io 1pf+0w To me, with a NeXTslab sitting on the desk next to my SUN 3/80 and across the hallway from four IBMrisc6000-320 systems, the NeXT-2.0 performs O.K. Cheers!Chas.