[comp.sys.next] UUCP, Flow Control, 040 Machines, and Trailblazers

jiro@com (Jiro Nakamura) (02/24/91)

Folks -
  I don't know if anyone would be interested in this trivia, but:
  I've been running a UUCP line to UUNET with a Traiblazer for over two
months now. I started with an 030 Cube and have recently upgraded to an
040. I was interested in seeing what a difference using hardware flow
control vs. XON/XOFF flow control would make in my transmissions.

  Well, here it is. Previously, with my 030 I had been achieving bps
rates of about 700-800 bytes per second (7000 to 8000 bits per second) as
reported by /etc/uucp/uucp.day.sh.
  
  When I switched to the 040, I have been getting bps rates of about
900-1000 bytes per second. Approximately an increase of 100 bytes per second,
or 10% increase.

  This is using a T2500 with PEP and UUCP spoofing, but no compression since
most of my traffic is precompressed NeXTMail and USENET (CNews with
compression).
 
  Also, I think I am getting less dropped connections and lost packets due
to UUCICO getting confused because of overrunned buffers or spurious XON/XOFF
characters in the byte stream. 

	- jiro nakamura

ps. I modified the old modem cable myself. Pretty trivial if you use the
zs man page.

-- 
Jiro Nakamura				jiro@shaman.com
Shaman Consulting			(607) 253-0687 VOICE
"Bring your dead, dying shamans here!"	(607) 253-7809 FAX/Modem

jacob@gore.com (Jacob Gore) (02/24/91)

/ comp.sys.next / jiro@com (Jiro Nakamura) / Feb 23, 1991 /
>   I've been running a UUCP line to UUNET with a Traiblazer for over two
> months now. I started with an 030 Cube and have recently upgraded to an
> 040. I was interested in seeing what a difference using hardware flow
> control vs. XON/XOFF flow control would make in my transmissions.

Don't use software flow control with UUCP, unless your data is only plain
ASCII (all uuencoded, for example).  UUCP protocols have their own way of
dealing with buffer overruns, they do not need flow control at all.  If the
only flow control option available to you is software (XON/XOFF or ACK/NAK,
for that matter), TURN IT OFF for UUCP transmissions!

Jacob
--
Jacob Gore		Jacob@Gore.Com			boulder!gore!jacob