ron@brl-sem.ARPA (Ron Natalie <ron>) (11/04/85)
It is time to poll the question on the creation of this group. QUESTION #1. I think some sort of newsgroup for collecting and archiving of documention (like net.sources) should exist. QUESTION #2. There has been some discussion about whether this should be a moderated list or not. Due to it's archival nature, I am pushing for a moderated list. Due to my work with putting together the documenation sets for BRL VAX UNIX version 3, I have acquired some expertise in this. I hereby volunteer to moderate. The rules for the proposed moderated list is as followed. All submissions will be checked. The following will not be forwarded: 1. Messages that aren't documentation, that were misposted. 2. Messages that are obviously not public domain works. 3. Exact duplicate messages In addition, I will archive these files at BRL. Periodically, I will post the catalog of archived files. Requests for copies can be mailed to the moderator, and I will respond. I hope to provide an AUTOMATED service for mailing out old-copies of the documentation. QUESTION 3. Given that either a net.xxx or mod.xxx group be created, what should appear in place of the xxx. This answer will be checked for consistancy with the group structure currently being established. MAIL MAIL MAIL - DO NOT POST NEWS - MAIL MAIL MAIL Mail to ...!seismo!brl-tgr!ron ...!{unc, decvax, ...}!brl-bmd!ron ----- Detach and Mail ----- QUESTION 1. A documentation newsgroup should exist. [ ] YES [ ] NO QUESTION 2. It should be a moderated list as described. [ ] It should be a free-for-all net.* group. [ ] Don't Care [ ] QUESTION 3. What should the stuff to the right of the period in net.xxx or mod.xxx be with regard to this newsgroup?