[net.auto] To buy or to Lease: That is the question...

klodnick@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU (John Klodnicki) (03/05/86)

I  was always under   the impression that  the  advantages of  new car
leasing could only be enjoyed by a business, or someone owning his own
business, writing off the  lease payments  for  a  tax break. However,
some recent literature (Business  Week's  Guide to  Careers)  seems to
suggest that leasing might be a good idea for the recent college  grad
(which I'm soon to become).  They  seem to think  that eliminating the
necessity for a  large down-payment is a great  advantage  for leasing
vs.  buying. Also, lease payments can  typically be less  than  montly
installments on a  car   loan,  easing the financial  burden   of  the
not-too-long-ago-starving-college-student. But is this  a  good idea??
Intuitively, it seems like a sure way to lose money.

The way I understand it  (feel free  to correct me)   is that you  can
compute your net  cash outlay for use of  the car for  four   years as
follows:

lease_price = monthly_lease_payment * 48.
buy_price = car_price + interest_paid - depreciated price of car after 4 years.

So it seems that if one  can reasonably predict  the depreciated value
of a car, it is  possible to figure which  deal is better. However,  I
have NO experience in the  new car market,  and as the time approaches
for me to graduate and junk my '73 Chevy w/170,000 miles and almost as
many dents, I would greatly  appreciate any advice  from anyone  wiser
out there.  Thanks.

##############
John Klodnicki
{seismo,allegra}!topaz!klodnick

heneghan@ihlpf.UUCP (Heneghan) (03/07/86)

> I  was always under   the impression that  the  advantages of  new car
> leasing could only be enjoyed by a business, or someone owning his own
> business, writing off the  lease payments  for  a  tax break. However,
> some recent literature (Business  Week's  Guide to  Careers)  seems to
> suggest that leasing might be a good idea for the recent college  grad
> (which I'm soon to become).  They  seem to think  that eliminating the
> necessity for a  large down-payment is a great  advantage  for leasing
> vs.  buying. Also, lease payments can  typically be less  than  montly
> installments on a  car   loan,  easing the financial  burden   of  the
> not-too-long-ago-starving-college-student. But is this  a  good idea??
> Intuitively, it seems like a sure way to lose money.
> 
> The way I understand it  (feel free  to correct me)   is that you  can
> compute your net  cash outlay for use of  the car for  four   years as
> follows:
> 
> lease_price = monthly_lease_payment * 48.
> buy_price = car_price + interest_paid - depreciated price of car after 4 years.
You forgot two small details: you own the car when you buy it (you can
still sell it) and both methods still require the owner to pay maintenance
costs.
> So it seems that if one  can reasonably predict  the depreciated value
> of a car, it is  possible to figure which  deal is better. However,  I
> have NO experience in the  new car market,  and as the time approaches
> for me to graduate and junk my '73 Chevy w/170,000 miles and almost as
> many dents, I would greatly  appreciate any advice  from anyone  wiser
> out there.  Thanks.
Also, consider the initial sales tax write-off plus the monthly interest.
If you need a car and can't afford a down payment and don't have enough
other write-offs to file long, this maybe an alternative.

Another thought is what if you want to unload the car before you finish
your payments, is it easier to unload car payments or lease payments
through the lending institution.

					Joe Heneghan