[gnu.utils.bug] ls still incompatible

mcgrath%tully.Berkeley.EDU@GINGER.BERKELEY.EDU (Roland McGrath) (05/14/89)

The -D flag added in GNU ls 1.5 doesn't do the right thing.

The only change I wanted was that if `foo' is a symlink to
directory `bar', and I say "ls foo", I want it to act as if
I said "ls bar".  Adding a flag for this is OK.
The -D flag implies -L, which I don't want.