rjc@maui.cs.ucla.edu (03/20/89)
Thanks for the explaination (`return;' not `return tmp;'). I would like to suggest/request a little more functionality with named return values. Specifically, it would be nice if the parameter names of the function were visible to the return value declaration. I would like to say: struct A { ... A(int x); ... }; A foo(int i) return tmp(i); { // do stuff to tmp return; } rather than: struct A { ... A(int x); ... }; A foo(int i) return tmp(-1); { tmp = i; // tmp = A(i) // do stuff to tmp return; } In general, this will save a constructor/destructor pair whenever the return value is initialized based on the actual arguments that are passed to the function. I have not thought this idea through completely, so there may be good reasons not to do this. For me, this would be a big win. Thanks, rob collins (rjc@cs.ucla.edu) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- rjc@cs.ucla.edu This is what happens when I sit on my keyboard: AISBDFAORI:KHGEDSYTFBFISKVDJ MN Next week: what happens when I throw my keyboard out the window!